Literature DB >> 26438326

Comparing the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm laser fibers in semirigid ureteroscopic Ho:YAG lithotripsy.

Stavros Sfoungaristos1, Ofer N Gofrit2, Ioannis Katafigiotis3, Dov Pode2, Ezekiel H Landau2, Vladimir Yutkin2, Constantinos A Constantinides3, Mordechai Duvdevani2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm Ho:YAG laser fiber in semirigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy and to identify parameters that may affect laser energy and time during the procedure.
METHODS: A database of 111 patients who undergone a semirigid ureteroscopy (SRURS) for ureteral stone lithotripsy was analyzed. A 365-μm core fiber was used in 56 cases, and a multiple-uses 550-μm laser fiber was used in 55 cases. A standard 6.4 W protocol (8 Hz, 0.8 J/pulse) was used in all cases. The association between laser fiber diameter and several preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters was evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean stone burden was 54.1 ± 39.1 mm(2), and postoperative stone-free and complication rate was 100.0 and 16.2 %, respectively. The 550-μm laser fiber diameter was significantly associated with lower laser energy (p = 0.01), energy/mm(3) (p = 0.031), number of pulses (p = 0.012), laser time (p = 0.012) and laser time/mm(3) (p = 0.043), while it did not affect postoperative outcomes. The multivariate analysis showed that shorter procedure duration, smaller stone burden and the 550-μm laser fiber were all significant independent predictors for decreased laser energy consumption.
CONCLUSION: The 550-μm laser fiber may decrease laser energy and time during SRURS lithotripsy with Ho:YAG laser compared to the 365 μm. Given its lower cost, it may represent the optimal choice for semirigid procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Holmium; Laser; Lithotripsy; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26438326     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1130-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  21 in total

1.  Durability of reusable holmium:YAG laser fibers: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Bodo E Knudsen; Renato Pedro; Bryan Hinck; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  EAU guidelines on laser technologies.

Authors:  Thomas R W Herrmann; Evangelos N Liatsikos; Udo Nagele; Olivier Traxer; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy--a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Holmium:YAG lithotripsy efficiency varies with energy density.

Authors:  G J Vassar; J M Teichman; R D Glickman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.

Authors:  Enrique Perez Castro; Palle J S Osther; Viorel Jinga; Hassan Razvi; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Kandarp Parikh; Ali R Kural; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Determinants of holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser time and energy during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; Giovanni S Marchini; Alexandre Pompeo; David Sehrt; Fernando J Kim; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones.

Authors:  Murat Binbay; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Avinash Singh; Tolga Akman; Erdem Tekinaslan; Omer Sarilar; Murat Baykal; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  A comparison of the FREDDY and holmium lasers during ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jennifer Yates; August Zabbo; Gyan Pareek
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; John Denstedt; Petrisor Geavlete; Francis Keeley; Tadashi Matsuda; Margaret Pearle; Glenn Preminger; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones.

Authors:  Shivadeo S Bapat; Ketan V Pai; Satyajeet S Purnapatre; Pushkaraj B Yadav; Abhijit S Padye
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of hydronephrosis grade on stone-free rate in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery with flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Batuhan Ergani; Mert Hamza Ozbilen; Mehmet Yigit Yalcın; Hayal Boyacıoglu; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2021-04-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.