Literature DB >> 2057313

Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention.

H W Kwak1, D Dagenbach, H Egeth.   

Abstract

The separation between stimuli was manipulated in a same-different matching task. In Experiment 1, stimuli were upright Ts and/or Ls, whereas in Experiment 2, they were rotated Ts and/or Ls. In both experiments, mean reaction time (RT) for the same-different judgment did not increase as a function of interletter separation, suggesting either that the time needed to relocate attention was independent of distance, or that the stimuli were processed in parallel. These alternatives were tested in a third experiment, with a diagnostic for parallel processing proposed by Egeth and Dagenbach (1991). The diagnostic indicated that the rotated Ts and Ls in Experiment 2 were processed serially. If serial processing implies the utilization of attention, then the results of Experiment 2 suggest that relocation of attention is time-invariant with respect to distance.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2057313     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  On analog movements of visual attention.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

3.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues.

Authors:  T D Murphy; C W Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

4.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Moving attention through visual space.

Authors:  G L Shulman; R W Remington; J P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Visual routines.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

8.  Moving attention: evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.

Authors:  R Remington; L Pierce
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04

9.  Normalization of irrelevant dimensions in stimulus comparisons.

Authors:  P Dixon; M A Just
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  30 in total

1.  Lateralization of frequency-specific networks for covert spatial attention to auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Samuel Thorpe; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

3.  Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): evidence for an attention-shifting model.

Authors:  J Müsseler; O Neumann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992

5.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Catherine A Orr; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a "depth-blind" attentional spotlight.

Authors:  T G Ghirardelli; C L Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

7.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

8.  Learning efficient visual search for stimuli containing diagnostic spatial configurations and color-shape conjunctions.

Authors:  Eric A Reavis; Sebastian M Frank; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Ester Reijnen; Michael J Van Wert; Yoana Kuzmova
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.

Authors:  Krista A Ehinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.