Literature DB >> 27192994

When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.

Krista A Ehinger1, Jeremy M Wolfe2.   

Abstract

Suppose that you are looking for visual targets in a set of images, each containing an unknown number of targets. How do you perform that search, and how do you decide when to move from the current image to the next? Optimal foraging theory predicts that foragers should leave the current image when the expected value from staying falls below the expected value from leaving. Here, we describe how to apply these models to more complex tasks, like search for objects in natural scenes where people have prior beliefs about the number and locations of targets in each image, and search is guided by target features and scene context. We model these factors in a guided search task and predict the optimal time to quit search. The data come from a satellite image search task. Participants searched for small gas stations in large satellite images. We model quitting times with a Bayesian model that incorporates prior beliefs about the number of targets in each map, average search efficiency (guidance), and actual search history in the image. Clicks deploying local magnification were used as surrogates for deployments of attention and, thus, for time. Leaving times (measured in mouse clicks) were well-predicted by the model. People terminated search when their expected rate of target collection fell to the average rate for the task. Apparently, people follow a rate-optimizing strategy in this task and use both their prior knowledge and search history in the image to decide when to quit searching.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absent trials; Foraging; Guided search; Satellite imagery; Search termination; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27192994      PMCID: PMC5014635          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1128-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

1.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Termination of a visual search with large display size effects.

Authors:  Denis Cousineau; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004

4.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

5.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

8.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Evan M Palmer; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.

Authors:  Matthew S Cain; Edward Vul; Kait Clark; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-08-06

10.  When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Making Sense of Real-World Scenes.

Authors:  George L Malcolm; Iris I A Groen; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Use-inspired basic research in medical image perception.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-14

4.  A simple survey protocol for assessing terrestrial biodiversity in a broad range of ecosystems.

Authors:  Asko Lõhmus; Piret Lõhmus; Kadri Runnel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatially and temporally distributed data foraging decisions in disciplinary field science.

Authors:  Cristina G Wilson; Feifei Qian; Douglas J Jerolmack; Sonia Roberts; Jonathan Ham; Daniel Koditschek; Thomas F Shipley
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-04-07

6.  Looking ahead: When do you find the next item in foraging visual search?

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Abla Alaoui-Soce; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.