Literature DB >> 1494610

Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): evidence for an attention-shifting model.

J Müsseler1, O Neumann.   

Abstract

When two vertical rods move through a horizontal window in close succession, the Tandem Effect can be observed. It consists of a spatial illusion (distance between the rods looking smaller than it actually is) and a temporal illusion (under certain conditions both rods are seen simultaneously in the window, though the first rod has left the window before the second rod enters it). We report six experiments that explored the distance-reduction illusion and tested an attentional model of the effect. It assumes that attention is initially focused on the first rod and then shifted to the second, when it enters the window. The percept of the pair of rods is integrated from the first rod's position at the beginning, and the second rod's position at the end, of the focus shift. Consequently their subjective distance will be smaller than their physical distance by the distance that they travel during the focus shift. Experiments 1 and 2 established the Tandem Effect as an empirical phenomenon and showed that its size depends on stimulus parameters such as window size and movement speed. Experiments 3-5 tested specific predictions from the attentional model. Experiment 6 examined a further illusion, the Fröhlich Effect, and showed that it can be subsumed under the model. The experiments produced some unexpected effects and some predictions from the model were only partly confirmed. It is shown that the main findings can be combined into two quantitative functions that describe the course of focusing. One implication is that visual attention does not "move" from one object to another; rather all attention shifts originate in the fovea. We discuss several alternative interpretations of our data and show that they are less satisfactory than the attentional model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1494610     DOI: 10.1007/bf01358263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  41 in total

1.  Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.

Authors:  C B Warner; J F Juola; H Koshino
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-09

2.  Effects of abruptly appearing clutter on a peripherally precued covert attention shift.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1991-01

3.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  "Seeing" shapes that are almost totally occluded: a new look at Parks's camel.

Authors:  S Shimojo; W Richards
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-06

5.  Phenomenal simutaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis.

Authors:  D A Allport
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1968-11

6.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.

Authors:  G Tassinari; S Aglioti; L Chelazzi; C A Marzi; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Moving attention: evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.

Authors:  R Remington; L Pierce
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04

8.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

9.  Subjective Lorentz transformations and the perception of motion.

Authors:  T Caelli; W Hoffman; H Lindman
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1978-03

10.  Sensory and cognitive factors in the processing of visual velocity.

Authors:  D Algom; L Cohen-Raz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  6 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: evidence for an attentional interpretation.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau; Odmar Neumann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

3.  Motion misperception caused by feedback connections: a neural model simulating the Fröhlich effect.

Authors:  Elena Carbone; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-28

4.  Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the 'Weather Station Model' of visual backward masking.

Authors:  Odmar Neumann; Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-20

5.  Position-dependent and position-independent attention shifts: evidence against the spotlight and premotor assumption of visual focussing.

Authors:  J Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

6.  Neurobiological mechanisms behind the spatiotemporal illusions of awareness used for advocating prediction or postdiction.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.