Literature DB >> 20567832

High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review.

Frederik L Giesel1, Amit Mehndiratta, Marco Essig.   

Abstract

Evaluation of brain lesions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides information that is critical for accurate diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic intervention and monitoring response. Conventional contrast-enhanced MR neuroimaging using gadolinium (Gd) contrast agents primarily depicts disruption of the blood-brain barrier, demonstrating location and extent of disease, and also the morphological details at the lesion site. However, conventional imaging results do not always accurately predict tumour aggressiveness. Advanced functional MRI techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging utilise contrast agents to convey physiological information regarding the haemodynamics and neoangiogenic status of the lesion that is often complementary to anatomical information obtained through conventional imaging. Most of the Gd contrast agents available have similar T1 and T2 relaxivities, and thus their contrast-enhancing capabilities are comparable. Exceptions are gadobenate-dimeglumine, Gd-EOB-DTPA, Gadobutrol and gadofosveset, which, owing to their transient-protein-binding capability, possess almost twice (and more) the T1 and T2 relaxivities as other agents at all magnetic field strengths. Numerous comparative studies have demonstrated the advantages of the increased relaxivity in terms of enhanced image contrast, image quality and diagnostic confidence. Here we summarise the benefits of higher relaxivity for the most common neuroimaging applications including MRI, perfusion-weighted imaging and MRA for evaluation of brain tumours, cerebrovascular disease and other CNS lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567832     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1805-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  79 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of metastatic disease to the brain with gadobenate dimeglumine.

Authors:  D Balériaux; C Colosimo; J Ruscalleda; M Korves; G Schneider; K Bohndorf; G Bongartz; M A van Buchem; M Reiser; K Sartor; M W Bourne; P M Parizel; G R Cherryman; I Salerio; A La Noce; G Pirovano; M A Kirchin; A Spinazzi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  MR evaluation of CNS tumors: dose comparison study with gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoteridol.

Authors:  W T Yuh; D J Fisher; J D Engelken; G M Greene; Y Sato; T J Ryals; M R Crain; J C Ehrhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparison of contrast agents with high molarity and with weak protein binding in cerebral perfusion imaging at 3 T.

Authors:  Oliver Thilmann; Elna-Marie Larsson; Isabella M Björkman-Burtscher; Freddy Ståhlberg; Ronnie Wirestam
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Magnetic resonance angiography with gadomer-17. An animal study original investigation.

Authors:  Q Dong; D R Hurst; H J Weinmann; T L Chenevert; F J Londy; M R Prince
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 5.  Multiple sclerosis: the role of MR imaging.

Authors:  Y Ge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Evaluation of intraaxial enhancing brain tumors on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for visualization and assessment, and implications for surgical intervention.

Authors:  Matthew J Kuhn; Piero Picozzi; Joseph A Maldjian; Ilona M Schmalfuss; Kenneth R Maravilla; Brian C Bowen; Franz J Wippold; Val M Runge; Michael V Knopp; Leo J Wolansky; Lars Gustafsson; Marco Essig; Nicoletta Anzalone
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  MR angiography of aortoiliac occlusive disease: a phase III study of the safety and effectiveness of the blood-pool contrast agent MS-325.

Authors:  Mathias Goyen; Mark Edelman; Pierre Perreault; Elaine O'Riordan; Hernan Bertoni; James Taylor; Daniel Siragusa; Melhem Sharafuddin; Emile R Mohler; Robert Breger; E Kent Yucel; Kohkan Shamsi; Robert M Weisskoff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the supraaortic vessels at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Eva Bueltmann; Gunter Erb; Miles A Kirchin; Uwe Klose; Thomas Naegele
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 9.  MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Authors:  Christoph J Zech; Karin A Herrmann; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 10.  The advantage of high relaxivity contrast agents in brain perfusion.

Authors:  François Cotton; Marc Hermier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Basic MR relaxation mechanisms and contrast agent design.

Authors:  Luis M De León-Rodríguez; André F Martins; Marco C Pinho; Neil M Rofsky; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  In vivo dentate nucleus MRI relaxometry correlates with previous administration of Gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Enrico Tedeschi; Giuseppe Palma; Antonietta Canna; Sirio Cocozza; Carmela Russo; Pasquale Borrelli; Roberta Lanzillo; Valentina Angelini; Emanuela Postiglione; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Marco Salvatore; Arturo Brunetti; Mario Quarantelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prospective intraindividual comparison of gadoterate and gadobutrol for cervical and intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Philip Hoelter; Stefan Lang; Marina Weibart; Manuel Schmidt; Michael F X Knott; Tobias Engelhorn; Marco Essig; Stephan Kloska; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Increasing signal intensity within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1W magnetic resonance images in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: correlation with cumulative dose of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent, gadobutrol.

Authors:  Dragan A Stojanov; Aleksandra Aracki-Trenkic; Slobodan Vojinovic; Daniela Benedeto-Stojanov; Srdjan Ljubisavljevic
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Gadolinium deposition within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus after repeated administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents-current status.

Authors:  Dragan Stojanov; Aleksandra Aracki-Trenkic; Daniela Benedeto-Stojanov
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: is it all we need for detecting metastases in melanoma patients?

Authors:  Giuseppe Petralia; Anwar Padhani; Paul Summers; Sarah Alessi; Sara Raimondi; Alessandro Testori; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  A review of responsive MRI contrast agents: 2005-2014.

Authors:  Dina V Hingorani; Adam S Bernstein; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Glioma vessel abnormality quantification using time-of-flight MR angiography.

Authors:  Maddalena Strumia; Wilfried Reichardt; Ori Staszewski; Dieter Henrik Heiland; Astrid Weyerbrock; Irina Mader; Michael Bock
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  B25716/1: a novel albumin-binding Gd-AAZTA MRI contrast agent with improved properties in tumor imaging.

Authors:  E Gianolio; C Cabella; S Colombo Serra; G Valbusa; F Arena; A Maiocchi; L Miragoli; F Tedoldi; F Uggeri; M Visigalli; P Bardini; S Aime
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.358

10.  Albumin-binding MR blood pool contrast agent improves diagnostic performance in human brain tumour: comparison of two contrast agents for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Josep Puig; Gerard Blasco; Marco Essig; Josep Daunis-I-Estadella; Gemma Laguillo; Ana María Quiles; Sebastián Remollo; Karsten Bergmann; Carme Joly; Lluis Bernado; Javier Sánchez-González; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.