OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) alone is adequate for detecting metastases in melanoma patients, or if standard WB contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (WB-ceMRI) is required. METHODS: Seventy-one WB-DWI studies were performed quarterly along with whole-body MRI including contrast-enhanced sequences (WB-ceMRI) in 19 patients with advanced melanoma. The reference standard was biopsy, other imaging investigations, or changes observed on follow-up. Findings of metastasis in separate WB-DWI and WB-DWI + WB-ceMRI readings were compared using κ statistics. Additionally, the distribution of findings was examined and calculated per body region (brain, neck, chest, abdomen, liver, pelvis, subcutaneous tissues, bones) and diagnostic accuracy (DA), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated per patient. RESULTS: The eight examinations that were positive by the reference standard contained a total of 14 metastatic findings. With almost perfect agreement between techniques (κ = 85 %, 95 % CI 70-100 %) for detection of examinations with metastatic findings, and complete agreement in extracranial metastasis detection, 10 metastases were detected using WB-DWI and 13 using WB-DWI + WB-ceMRI. WB-DWI and WB-DWI + WB-MRI had equivalent per patient DA (79 %). CONCLUSIONS: WB-DWI without additional WB-ceMRI sequences is promising for the detection of extracranial metastases in melanoma patients, but contrast-enhanced MRI is required for evaluating the brain.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) alone is adequate for detecting metastases in melanomapatients, or if standard WB contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (WB-ceMRI) is required. METHODS: Seventy-one WB-DWI studies were performed quarterly along with whole-body MRI including contrast-enhanced sequences (WB-ceMRI) in 19 patients with advanced melanoma. The reference standard was biopsy, other imaging investigations, or changes observed on follow-up. Findings of metastasis in separate WB-DWI and WB-DWI + WB-ceMRI readings were compared using κ statistics. Additionally, the distribution of findings was examined and calculated per body region (brain, neck, chest, abdomen, liver, pelvis, subcutaneous tissues, bones) and diagnostic accuracy (DA), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated per patient. RESULTS: The eight examinations that were positive by the reference standard contained a total of 14 metastatic findings. With almost perfect agreement between techniques (κ = 85 %, 95 % CI 70-100 %) for detection of examinations with metastatic findings, and complete agreement in extracranial metastasis detection, 10 metastases were detected using WB-DWI and 13 using WB-DWI + WB-ceMRI. WB-DWI and WB-DWI + WB-MRI had equivalent per patient DA (79 %). CONCLUSIONS: WB-DWI without additional WB-ceMRI sequences is promising for the detection of extracranial metastases in melanomapatients, but contrast-enhanced MRI is required for evaluating the brain.
Authors: Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gerald Antoch; Florian M Vogt; Lutz S Freudenberg; Fridun Nazaradeh; Susanne C Goehde; Jörg Barkhausen; Gerlinde Dahmen; Andreas Bockisch; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-12-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stuart A Taylor; Susan Mallett; Anne Miles; Stephen Morris; Laura Quinn; Caroline S Clarke; Sandy Beare; John Bridgewater; Vicky Goh; Sam Janes; Dow-Mu Koh; Alison Morton; Neal Navani; Alfred Oliver; Anwar Padhani; Shonit Punwani; Andrea Rockall; Steve Halligan Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Ferdinand Seith; Andrea Forschner; Holger Schmidt; Christina Pfannenberg; Brigitte Gückel; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christian la Fougère; Claus Garbe; Nina Schwenzer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Giorgio Conte; Lorenzo Preda; Emilia Cocorocchio; Sara Raimondi; Caterina Giannitto; Marta Minotti; Francesca De Piano; Giuseppe Petralia; Pier Francesco Ferrucci; Massimo Bellomi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Pietro Valerio Foti; Renato Farina; Maria Coronella; Stefano Palmucci; Angelo Montana; Alessandra Sigona; Michele Reibaldi; Antonio Longo; Andrea Russo; Teresio Avitabile; Rosario Caltabiano; Lidia Puzzo; Marco Ragusa; Cesare Mariotti; Pietro Milone; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Sileny N Han; Frédéric Amant; Katrijn Michielsen; Frederik De Keyzer; Steffen Fieuws; Kristel Van Calsteren; Raphaëla C Dresen; Mina Mhallem Gziri; Vincent Vandecaveye Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stuart A Taylor; Sue Mallett; Anne Miles; Sandy Beare; Gauraang Bhatnagar; John Bridgewater; Rob Glynne-Jones; Vicky Goh; Ashley M Groves; Sam M Janes; Dow Mu Koh; Steve Morris; Alison Morton; Neal Navani; Alf Oliver; Anwar R Padhani; Shonit Punwani; Andrea G Rockall; Steve Halligan Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 4.430