Literature DB >> 20173194

Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding.

Mark A McDaniel1, Michael K Scullin.   

Abstract

An implementation intention encoding, one that specifies the concrete situation that is appropriate for initiating an intended action and links that situational cue to the intended action, has been shown to improve prospective memory. One proposed mechanism is that implementation intentions create automatized prospective remembering. This view anticipates that implementation intentions should prevent prospective memory decline in highly cognitively demanding situations. Contrary to this expectation, although implementation intention encoding enhanced prospective memory (Experiments 1 and 2), implementation-intention encoding did not buffer against significant prospective memory decline in high-cognitive-demand conditions (Experiments 1-3), and in Experiment 3, implementation intention encoding produced lower levels of prospective memory performance than did behavioral practice in the high-cognitive-demand situation. We suggest that although implementation intentions may stimulate a strong associative encoding (between an anticipated environmental cue and an intended action), that encoding does not support a completely automatized prospective memory response.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20173194     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.2.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  22 in total

1.  Implementation intentions and facilitation of prospective memory.

Authors:  A L Chasteen; D C Park; N Schwarz
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

2.  Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  M Kliegel; M Martin; M A McDaniel; G O Einstein
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2001-01

3.  The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Valerie Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

6.  A neural network model of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Ehren L Newman; Greg Detre
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Daniel C Howard; Karin M Butler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

8.  Working memory and supervisory control after severe closed-head injury. A study of dual task performance and random generation.

Authors:  P Azouvi; C Jokic; M Van der Linden; N Marlier; B Bussel
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.475

9.  Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: protection motivation theory and implementation intentions.

Authors:  Sarah Milne; Sheina Orbell; Paschal Sheeran
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2002-05

10.  Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Carrie L Williford; Jason L Pagan; R Key Dismukes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-09
View more
  28 in total

1.  Resource depletion does not influence prospective memory in college students.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Michael J Cahill; Hillary G Mullet; Michael K Scullin; Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-09-08

2.  Prospective memory and aging: preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

3.  Implementation intentions and imagery: individual and combined effects on prospective memory among young adults.

Authors:  Craig McFarland; Elizabeth Glisky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

4.  An implementation intention strategy can improve prospective memory in older adults with very mild Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ji Hae Lee; Jill T Shelton; Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-05-20

5.  Response dynamics in prospective memory.

Authors:  Drew H Abney; Dawn M McBride; Angela M Conte; David W Vinson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

6.  Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill T Shelton; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Prospective memory training in older adults and its relevance for successful aging.

Authors:  Alexandra Hering; Peter G Rendell; Nathan S Rose; Katharina M Schnitzspahn; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-04-18

8.  Improving Prospective Memory in Healthy Older Adults and Individuals with Very Mild Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Ji Hae Lee; Michael K Scullin; Nathan S Rose; Peter G Rendell; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Prospective Memory Training: Outlining a New Approach.

Authors:  Emily R Waldum; Carolyn L Dufault; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  Sweetened drink and snacking cues in adolescents: a study using ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Jerry L Grenard; Alan W Stacy; Saul Shiffman; Amanda N Baraldi; David P MacKinnon; Ginger Lockhart; Yasemin Kisbu-Sakarya; Sarah Boyle; Yuliyana Beleva; Carol Koprowski; Susan L Ames; Kim D Reynolds
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.