Literature DB >> 19460950

Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories.

Michael K Scullin1, Gilles O Einstein, Mark A McDaniel.   

Abstract

McDaniel and Einstein (2007) argued that prospective memories can be retrieved through spontaneous retrieval processes stimulated by the presence of a target cue. To test this claim, we investigated whether presenting a prospective memory cue during a task that did not require an intention to be performed spontaneously triggered remembering of that intention. In two experiments, participants performed an image-rating task in which a prospective memory task (to press the "Q" key when a target word appeared) was embedded. Then, participants were told that their intention was finished or suspended. Finally, participants performed a lexical decision task in which each target (and a matched control) word appeared. RTs were slower to target words than to control words when the intention was suspended but not when it was finished. These results suggest that target cues associated with suspended intentions can spontaneously trigger remembering but that finished intentions are quickly deactivated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19460950     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.4.425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Gabriel I Cook; Jeffrey S Hansen; Andrew L Pallos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Valerie Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

5.  Gone but not forgotten: the effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory.

Authors:  Robert West; M Windy McNerney; Stephanie Travers
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation.

Authors:  Lia Kvavilashvili; Laura Fisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-02

7.  The cost of event-based prospective memory: salient target events.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; R Reed Hunt; Jennifer C McVay; Melissa D McConnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Alexander Jaudas; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

Review 9.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Normal aging and prospective memory.

Authors:  G O Einstein; M A McDaniel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  22 in total

1.  The difficulty of letting go: moderators of the deactivation of completed intentions.

Authors:  Moritz Walser; Thomas Goschke; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-11

2.  Prospective memory and aging: preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

3.  Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

4.  Response dynamics in prospective memory.

Authors:  Drew H Abney; Dawn M McBride; Angela M Conte; David W Vinson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 5.  From retrospective to prospective memory research: a framework for investigating the deactivation of intentions.

Authors:  Patrícia Matos; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-03-10

6.  Negative prospective memory: remembering not to perform an action.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Pink; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

7.  Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill T Shelton; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Intention deactivation: effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions.

Authors:  Moritz Walser; Thomas Goschke; Marcus Möschl; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-08-13

9.  Whoops, I did it again: commission errors in prospective memory.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-11-14

10.  The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill Talley Shelton
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.