Literature DB >> 36190658

Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.

Larissa Leist1, Thomas Lachmann2,3, Sabine J Schlittmeier4, Markus Georgi4, Maria Klatte2.   

Abstract

Immediate serial recall of visually presented items is reliably impaired by task-irrelevant speech that the participants are instructed to ignore ("irrelevant speech effect," ISE). The ISE is stronger with changing speech tokens (words or syllables) when compared to repetitions of single tokens ("changing-state effect," CSE). These phenomena have been attributed to sound-induced diversions of attention away from the focal task (attention capture account), or to specific interference of obligatory, involuntary sound processing with either the integrity of phonological traces in a phonological short-term store (phonological loop account), or the efficiency of a domain-general rehearsal process employed for serial order retention (changing-state account). Aiming to further explore the role of attention, phonological coding, and serial order retention in the ISE, we analyzed the effects of steady-state and changing-state speech on serial order reconstruction of visually presented verbal and spatial items in children (n = 81) and adults (n = 80). In the verbal task, both age groups performed worse with changing-state speech (sequences of different syllables) when compared with steady-state speech (one syllable repeated) and silence. Children were more impaired than adults by both speech sounds. In the spatial task, no disruptive effect of irrelevant speech was found in either group. These results indicate that irrelevant speech evokes similarity-based interference, and thus pose difficulties for the attention-capture and the changing-state account of the ISE.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Auditory distraction; Changing-state effect; Children; Irrelevant sound effect; Serial recall; Verbal short-term memory; Visuo-spatial short-term memory

Year:  2022        PMID: 36190658     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01359-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  42 in total

1.  Effects of auditory distraction on electrophysiological brain activity and performance in children aged 8-13 years.

Authors:  Valentina Gumenyuk; Oleg Korzyukov; Kimmo Alho; Carles Escera; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

3.  Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott; Alicia M Briganti
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-03-28

4.  ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner; Susanne Mayr
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: are they separable?

Authors:  Tracy Packiam Alloway; Susan Elizabeth Gathercole; Susan J Pickering
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

6.  Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.

Authors:  Danielle E Eagan; Jason M Chein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Individual differences in susceptibility to the "irrelevant speech effect".

Authors:  W Ellermeier; K Zimmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Jan P Röer; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Reassessing the token set size effect on serial recall: Implications for theories of auditory distraction.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Jan P Röer; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies.

Authors:  Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.