Literature DB >> 20551253

The potential for undertaking slow CT using a modern CT scanner.

C D Chinneck1, M McJury, A R Hounsell.   

Abstract

Respiratory motion complicates target volume definition for patients with lung cancer. The use of slow CT to aid in the definition of moving target volumes was investigated. Standard and slow scans of an oscillating phantom were acquired using gantry rotation periods of 0.8 and 1.5 s and pitches of 0.95 and 0.50, respectively. The resultant images of three spheres within the phantom, labelled as A, B and C with diameters of 3.7, 2.8 and 2.2 cm, were analysed. The central co-ordinates of each volume were determined, and the ratio of the target volume outlined on CT (TV(CT)) to the true target volume (TV) was calculated. For 1.5 cm peak-to-trough (PTT) motion, standard CT mean ratios of 0.8, 0.8 and 0.7 were obtained for spheres A, B and C, respectively, whereas slow CT resulted in a mean ratio of 0.9 for all three spheres. For 2.5 cm motion, standard CT mean ratios of 0.8, 0.7 and 0.7 were obtained, whereas the slow CT mean ratios were 0.9, 0.9 and 0.8. The deviation of the central co-ordinate for the slow CT volumes was within 0.1 cm whereas deviations of up to 0.7 cm were seen using standard CT. This study indicates the potential benefit of using slow CT, even on modern scanners capable of rotation periods only down to 1.5 s, to define moving target volumes more accurately and reproducibly moving target volumes, and aid in the management of respiratory motion for patients with lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551253      PMCID: PMC3473507          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/31551018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  16 in total

1.  A method for incorporating organ motion due to breathing into 3D dose calculations.

Authors:  A E Lujan; E W Larsen; J M Balter; R K Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Artifacts in computed tomography scanning of moving objects.

Authors:  George T Y Chen; Jong H Kung; Kevin P Beaudette
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Compensation for respiratory motion by gated radiotherapy: an experimental study.

Authors:  Lars Dietrich; Thomas Tücking; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Physical evaluation of CT scan methods for radiation therapy planning: comparison of fast, slow and gating scan using the 256-detector row CT scanner.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Nobuyuki Kanematsu; Hideyuki Mizuno; Masayoshi Sunaoka; Masahiro Endo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Radiotherapy planning for lung cancer: slow CTs allow the drawing of tighter margins.

Authors:  Karl Wurstbauer; Heinz Deutschmann; Peter Kopp; Felix Sedlmayer
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Gig S Mageras; James M Balter; Richard S Emery; Kenneth M Forster; Steve B Jiang; Jeffrey M Kapatoes; Daniel A Low; Martin J Murphy; Brad R Murray; Chester R Ramsey; Marcel B Van Herk; S Sastry Vedam; John W Wong; Ellen Yorke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Differences in the definition of internal target volumes using slow CT alone or in combination with thin-slice CT under breath-holding conditions during the planning of stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Seki; Etsuo Kunieda; Atsuya Takeda; Tomoaki Nagaoka; Hossain M Deloar; Takatsugu Kawase; Junichi Fukada; Osamu Kawaguchi; Minoru Uematsu; Atsushi Kubo
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Assessing respiration-induced tumor motion and internal target volume using four-dimensional computed tomography for radiotherapy of lung cancer.

Authors:  H Helen Liu; Peter Balter; Teresa Tutt; Bum Choi; Joy Zhang; Catherine Wang; Melinda Chi; Dershan Luo; Tinsu Pan; Sandeep Hunjan; George Starkschall; Isaac Rosen; Karl Prado; Zhongxing Liao; Joe Chang; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Radhe Mohan; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Comparison of different strategies to use four-dimensional computed tomography in treatment planning for lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Jochem W H Wolthaus; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Marcel van Herk; José S A Belderbos; Maddalena M G Rossi; Joos V Lebesque; Eugène M F Damen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Phantom investigation of 3D motion-dependent volume aliasing during CT simulation for radiation therapy planning.

Authors:  James A Tanyi; Martin Fuss; Vladimir Varchena; Jack L Lancaster; Bill J Salter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  6 in total

1.  The importance of surrounding tissues and window settings for contouring of moving targets.

Authors:  Kai Joachim Borm; Markus Oechsner; Johannes Berndt; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Michael Molls; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Interobserver variability of patient positioning using four different CT datasets for image registration in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Markus Oechsner; Barbara Chizzali; Michal Devecka; Stefan Münch; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Jan Jakob Wilkens; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Usefulness of target delineation based on the two extreme phases of a four-dimensional computed tomography scan in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Seong Soon Jang; Gil Ja Huh; Suk Young Park; Po Song Yang; EunYoun Cho
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Dosimetric impact of different CT datasets for stereotactic treatment planning using 3D conformal radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Markus Oechsner; Leonhard Odersky; Johannes Berndt; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Jan Jakob Wilkens; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Registration uncertainties between 3D cone beam computed tomography and different reference CT datasets in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Markus Oechsner; Barbara Chizzali; Michal Devecka; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Jan Jakob Wilkens; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Reconstitution of internal target volumes by combining four-dimensional computed tomography and a modified slow computed tomography scan in stereotactic body radiotherapy planning for lung cancer.

Authors:  Seong Soon Jang; Gil Ja Huh; Suk Young Park; Po Song Yang; Hae Nam Chung; Jae Hyuk Seo; Ji Chan Park; Young Jun Yang; Eun Youn Cho
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.