Literature DB >> 28726056

Interobserver variability of patient positioning using four different CT datasets for image registration in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Markus Oechsner1,2, Barbara Chizzali3, Michal Devecka3, Stefan Münch3, Stephanie Elisabeth Combs3,4,5, Jan Jakob Wilkens3,4,5, Marciana Nona Duma3,4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of different reference CT datasets on manual image registration with free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) cone beam CTs (FB-CBCT) for patient positioning by several observers.
METHODS: For 48 patients with lung lesions, manual image registration with FB-CBCTs was performed by four observers. A slow planning CT (PCT), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and midventilation CT (MidV) were used as reference images. Couch shift differences between the four reference CT datasets for each observer as well as shift differences between the observers for the same reference CT dataset were determined. Statistical analyses were performed and correlations between the registration differences and the 3D tumor motion and the CBCT score were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean 3D shift difference between different reference CT datasets was the smallest for AIPvsMIP (range 1.1-2.2 mm) and the largest for MidVvsPCT (2.8-3.5 mm) with differences >10 mm. The 3D shifts showed partially significant correlations to 3D tumor motion and CBCT score. The interobserver comparison for the same reference CTs resulted in the smallest ∆3D mean differences and mean ∆3D standard deviation for ∆AIP (1.5 ± 0.7 mm, 0.7 ± 0.4 mm). The maximal 3D shift difference between observers was 10.4 mm (∆MidV). Both 3D tumor motion and mean CBCT score correlated with the shift differences (Rs = 0.336-0.740).
CONCLUSION: The applied reference CT dataset impacts image registration and causes interobserver variabilities. The 3D tumor motion and CBCT quality affect shift differences. The smallest differences were found for AIP which might be the most appropriate CT dataset for image registration with FB-CBCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Average intensity projection; Image registration; Maximum intensity projection; Mid-ventilation; SBRT; Inter-observer variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28726056     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1184-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  40 in total

1.  American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guidelines for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT).

Authors:  Louis Potters; Laurie E Gaspar; Brian Kavanagh; James M Galvin; Alan C Hartford; James M Hevezi; Patrick A Kupelian; Najeeb Mohiden; Michael A Samuels; Robert Timmerman; Prabhakar Tripuraneni; Maria T Vlachaki; Lei Xing; Seth A Rosenthal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Quantification of the variability of diaphragm motion and implications for treatment margin construction.

Authors:  Simon Rit; Marcel van Herk; Lambert Zijp; Jan-Jakob Sonke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Geometric accuracy of a real-time target tracking system with dynamic multileaf collimator tracking system.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Herbert Cattell; Damodar Pokhrel; Sonja Dieterich; Kenneth H Wong; Martin J Murphy; S Sastry Vedam; Krishni Wijesooriya; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  The importance of surrounding tissues and window settings for contouring of moving targets.

Authors:  Kai Joachim Borm; Markus Oechsner; Johannes Berndt; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Michael Molls; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Comparison of helical and average computed tomography for stereotactic body radiation treatment planning and normal tissue contouring in lung cancer.

Authors:  K Han; P S Basran; P Cheung
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.126

6.  Cone-beam CT based image-guidance for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary tumors.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Juergen Meyer; Juergen Wilbert; Kurt Baier; Gerd Mueller; Joern Wulf; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Dosimetric comparison of treatment plans based on free breathing, maximum, and average intensity projection CTs for lung cancer SBRT.

Authors:  Yuan Tian; Zhiheng Wang; Hong Ge; Tian Zhang; Jing Cai; Christopher Kelsey; David Yoo; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Evaluation of respiratory movement during gated radiotherapy using film and electronic portal imaging.

Authors:  E C Ford; G S Mageras; E Yorke; K E Rosenzweig; R Wagman; C C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Use of Maximum Intensity Projections (MIPs) for target outlining in 4DCT radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Rebecca Muirhead; Stuart G McNee; Carrie Featherstone; Karen Moore; Sarah Muscat
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy: principles and practice for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Guckenberger; N Andratschke; H Alheit; R Holy; C Moustakis; U Nestle; O Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.621

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of radiographer interobserver image registration variability using cone beam CT and MR for cervix radiotherapy.

Authors:  John Rodgers; Rosie Hales; Lee Whiteside; Jacqui Parker; Louise McHugh; Anthea Cree; Marcel van Herk; Ananya Choudhury; Peter Hoskin; Alan McWilliam; Cynthia L Eccles
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Moving targets in 4D-CTs versus MIP and AIP: comparison of patients data to phantom data.

Authors:  Kai Joachim Borm; Markus Oechsner; Moritz Wiegandt; Andreas Hofmeister; Stephanie E Combs; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.