Markus Oechsner1,2, Barbara Chizzali3, Michal Devecka3, Stefan Münch3, Stephanie Elisabeth Combs3,4,5, Jan Jakob Wilkens3,4,5, Marciana Nona Duma3,4,5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany. markus.oechsner@mri.tum.de. 2. Zentrum für Stereotaxie und personalisierte Hochpräzisionsstrahlentherapie (StereotakTUM), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. markus.oechsner@mri.tum.de. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany. 4. Zentrum für Stereotaxie und personalisierte Hochpräzisionsstrahlentherapie (StereotakTUM), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 5. Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the impact of different reference CT datasets on manual image registration with free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) cone beam CTs (FB-CBCT) for patient positioning by several observers. METHODS: For 48 patients with lung lesions, manual image registration with FB-CBCTs was performed by four observers. A slow planning CT (PCT), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and midventilation CT (MidV) were used as reference images. Couch shift differences between the four reference CT datasets for each observer as well as shift differences between the observers for the same reference CT dataset were determined. Statistical analyses were performed and correlations between the registration differences and the 3D tumor motion and the CBCT score were calculated. RESULTS: The mean 3D shift difference between different reference CT datasets was the smallest for AIPvsMIP (range 1.1-2.2 mm) and the largest for MidVvsPCT (2.8-3.5 mm) with differences >10 mm. The 3D shifts showed partially significant correlations to 3D tumor motion and CBCT score. The interobserver comparison for the same reference CTs resulted in the smallest ∆3D mean differences and mean ∆3D standard deviation for ∆AIP (1.5 ± 0.7 mm, 0.7 ± 0.4 mm). The maximal 3D shift difference between observers was 10.4 mm (∆MidV). Both 3D tumor motion and mean CBCT score correlated with the shift differences (Rs = 0.336-0.740). CONCLUSION: The applied reference CT dataset impacts image registration and causes interobserver variabilities. The 3D tumor motion and CBCT quality affect shift differences. The smallest differences were found for AIP which might be the most appropriate CT dataset for image registration with FB-CBCT.
PURPOSE: To assess the impact of different reference CT datasets on manual image registration with free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) cone beam CTs (FB-CBCT) for patient positioning by several observers. METHODS: For 48 patients with lung lesions, manual image registration with FB-CBCTs was performed by four observers. A slow planning CT (PCT), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and midventilation CT (MidV) were used as reference images. Couch shift differences between the four reference CT datasets for each observer as well as shift differences between the observers for the same reference CT dataset were determined. Statistical analyses were performed and correlations between the registration differences and the 3D tumor motion and the CBCT score were calculated. RESULTS: The mean 3D shift difference between different reference CT datasets was the smallest for AIPvsMIP (range 1.1-2.2 mm) and the largest for MidVvsPCT (2.8-3.5 mm) with differences >10 mm. The 3D shifts showed partially significant correlations to 3D tumor motion and CBCT score. The interobserver comparison for the same reference CTs resulted in the smallest ∆3D mean differences and mean ∆3D standard deviation for ∆AIP (1.5 ± 0.7 mm, 0.7 ± 0.4 mm). The maximal 3D shift difference between observers was 10.4 mm (∆MidV). Both 3D tumor motion and mean CBCT score correlated with the shift differences (Rs = 0.336-0.740). CONCLUSION: The applied reference CT dataset impacts image registration and causes interobserver variabilities. The 3D tumor motion and CBCT quality affect shift differences. The smallest differences were found for AIP which might be the most appropriate CT dataset for image registration with FB-CBCT.
Entities:
Keywords:
Average intensity projection; Image registration; Maximum intensity projection; Mid-ventilation; SBRT; Inter-observer variability
Authors: Louis Potters; Laurie E Gaspar; Brian Kavanagh; James M Galvin; Alan C Hartford; James M Hevezi; Patrick A Kupelian; Najeeb Mohiden; Michael A Samuels; Robert Timmerman; Prabhakar Tripuraneni; Maria T Vlachaki; Lei Xing; Seth A Rosenthal Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kai Joachim Borm; Markus Oechsner; Johannes Berndt; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Michael Molls; Marciana Nona Duma Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: E C Ford; G S Mageras; E Yorke; K E Rosenzweig; R Wagman; C C Ling Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M Guckenberger; N Andratschke; H Alheit; R Holy; C Moustakis; U Nestle; O Sauer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: John Rodgers; Rosie Hales; Lee Whiteside; Jacqui Parker; Louise McHugh; Anthea Cree; Marcel van Herk; Ananya Choudhury; Peter Hoskin; Alan McWilliam; Cynthia L Eccles Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Kai Joachim Borm; Markus Oechsner; Moritz Wiegandt; Andreas Hofmeister; Stephanie E Combs; Marciana Nona Duma Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 4.430