Karl Wurstbauer1, Heinz Deutschmann, Peter Kopp, Felix Sedlmayer. 1. Universittsklinik fuer Radiotherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Salzburger Landeskliniken und Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversitaet, Salzburg, Austria. k.wurstbauer@salk.at
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluation of the use of planning CTs with slow revolution time (4s/slice; 'slow CTs') in the planning procedure of radiotherapy for lung cancer patients in comparison to commonly used 'fast' planning CTs; impact on margin assessment of planning target volume (PTV) design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen lung cancer patients (six upper, lower lobe and central tumors, respectively) have been scanned each by three series of slow CTs and one fast CT (spiral CT). Patients have been freely breathing. The largest transversal tumor diameters in slow and fast CTs have been measured. Tumor edge positions have been determined for six spatial directions in all slices of the three slow CT series. RESULTS: Slow CTs show larger dimensions of the visible tumor than fast CTs. The median difference of the diameter for all tumors is 2mm (range 0-4mm). Slow CTs deliver constant depictions of lung tumors within a range of 1.6mm in all directions. This margin is considered to be sufficient to compensate for tumor movements by respiration and cardiovascular motions (internal margin). A margin of 7 mm added to the GTV of a single slow CT series to draw the PTV is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Slow planning CTs show larger, but highly constant depictions of lung tumors in comparison to conventional fast CT scanning, yielding an integral delineation of almost all positions of the moving tumors. Thus the use of slow planning CTs enables the drawing of tighter margins in external beam treatment planning of lung cancer.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluation of the use of planning CTs with slow revolution time (4s/slice; 'slow CTs') in the planning procedure of radiotherapy for lung cancerpatients in comparison to commonly used 'fast' planning CTs; impact on margin assessment of planning target volume (PTV) design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen lung cancerpatients (six upper, lower lobe and central tumors, respectively) have been scanned each by three series of slow CTs and one fast CT (spiral CT). Patients have been freely breathing. The largest transversal tumor diameters in slow and fast CTs have been measured. Tumor edge positions have been determined for six spatial directions in all slices of the three slow CT series. RESULTS: Slow CTs show larger dimensions of the visible tumor than fast CTs. The median difference of the diameter for all tumors is 2mm (range 0-4mm). Slow CTs deliver constant depictions of lung tumors within a range of 1.6mm in all directions. This margin is considered to be sufficient to compensate for tumor movements by respiration and cardiovascular motions (internal margin). A margin of 7 mm added to the GTV of a single slow CT series to draw the PTV is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Slow planning CTs show larger, but highly constant depictions of lung tumors in comparison to conventional fast CT scanning, yielding an integral delineation of almost all positions of the moving tumors. Thus the use of slow planning CTs enables the drawing of tighter margins in external beam treatment planning of lung cancer.
Authors: Kai Joachim Borm; Markus Oechsner; Johannes Berndt; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Michael Molls; Marciana Nona Duma Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Karl Wurstbauer; Hannes Weise; Heinz Deutschmann; Peter Kopp; Florian Merz; Michael Studnicka; Olaf Nairz; Felix Sedlmayer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Markus Oechsner; Barbara Chizzali; Michal Devecka; Stefan Münch; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Jan Jakob Wilkens; Marciana Nona Duma Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Karl Wurstbauer; Heinz Deutschmann; Karin Dagn; Peter Kopp; Franz Zehentmayr; Bernd Lamprecht; Peter Porsch; Birgit Wegleitner; Michael Studnicka; Felix Sedlmayer Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Coen W Hurkmans; Johan P Cuijpers; Frank J Lagerwaard; Joachim Widder; Uulke A van der Heide; Danny Schuring; Suresh Senan Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 3.481