Literature DB >> 9821784

The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free field: an event-related potential study.

W A Teder-Sälejärvi1, S A Hillyard.   

Abstract

Young adult subjects attended selectively to brief noise bursts delivered in free field via a horizontal array of seven loudspeakers spaced apart by 9 degrees of angle. Frequent "standard" stimuli (90%) and infrequent "target/deviant" stimuli (10%) of increased bandwidth were delivered at a fast rate in a random sequence equiprobably from each speaker. In separate runs, the subjects' task was to selectively attend to the leftmost, center, or rightmost speaker and to press a button to the infrequent "target" stimuli occurring at the designated spatial location. Behavioral detection rates and concurrently recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) indicated that auditory attention was deployed as a finely tuned gradient around the attended sound source, thus providing support for gradient models of auditory spatial attention. Furthermore, the ERP data suggested that the spatial focusing of attention was achieved in two distinct stages, with an early more broadly tuned filtering of inputs occurring over the first 80-200 msec after stimulus onset, followed by a more narrowly focused selection of attended-location deviants that began at around 250 msec and closely resembled the behavioral gradient of target detections.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9821784     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring the benefit of auditory spatial continuity.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Enhancing Auditory Selective Attention Using a Visually Guided Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Proprioceptive cues modulate further processing of spatially congruent auditory information. a high-density EEG study.

Authors:  S L Simon-Dack; W A Teder-Sälejärvi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Pádraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-23

8.  A new auditory multi-class brain-computer interface paradigm: spatial hearing as an informative cue.

Authors:  Martijn Schreuder; Benjamin Blankertz; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention are enhanced by computerized training: electrophysiological evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children.

Authors:  Courtney Stevens; Jessica Fanning; Donna Coch; Lisa Sanders; Helen Neville
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Courtney Stevens; Brittni Lauinger; Helen Neville
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.