Literature DB >> 19304606

Speech intelligibility reduces over distance from an attended location: evidence for an auditory spatial gradient of attention.

Kachina Allen1, David Alais, Simon Carlile.   

Abstract

Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured at a central focus of attention and at 20 degrees, 40 degrees, and 60 degrees locations distant in azimuth. Measurements were taken with one target collocated with two maskers, or with maskers flanking the target by +/-20 degrees. For 80% of trials, the target was played from the attended location ("expected"), and 20% came from another ("unexpected") location. For collocated stimuli, SRTs worsened with increasing distance from the expected location by 2.1 dB over the 60 degrees azimuth and by 5.1 dB for spatially separated target and maskers. In spatially separated conditions, a 2.9-dB change was still found when gaze was away from the attended location. Spatial attention appears to increase speech intelligibility against interferers, with gain decreasing with distance from the focus of attention. Spatial release from masking (RFM) was only found for the attended location. Further experiments suggest that target location uncertainty prevented RFM at unattended locations.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304606     DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.1.164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  12 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring the benefit of auditory spatial continuity.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of forward masking on sound localization in cats: basic findings with broadband maskers.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cat-astrophic effects of sudden interruptions on spatial auditory attention.

Authors:  Wusheng Liang; Christopher A Brown; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Auditory cortex spatial sensitivity sharpens during task performance.

Authors:  Chen-Chung Lee; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  A Collection of Pseudo-Words to Study Multi-Talker Speech Intelligibility without Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-15

8.  Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking.

Authors:  Gaven Lin; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech.

Authors:  Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The pupil response is sensitive to divided attention during speech processing.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.