Literature DB >> 34288759

Selective auditory attention modulates cortical responses to sound location change in younger and older adults.

Erol J Ozmeral1, David A Eddins1, Ann Clock Eddins1.   

Abstract

The present study measured scalp potentials in response to low-frequency, narrowband noise bursts changing location in the front, azimuthal plane. At question was whether selective auditory attention has a modulatory effect on the cortical encoding of spatial change and whether older listeners with normal-hearing thresholds would show depressed cortical representation for spatial changes relative to younger listeners. Young and older normal-hearing listeners were instructed to either passively listen to the stimulus presentation or actively attend to a single location (either 30° left or right of midline) and detect when a noise stream moved to the attended location. Prominent peaks of the electroencephalographic scalp waveforms were compared across groups, locations, and attention conditions. In addition, an opponent-channel model of spatial coding was performed to capture the effect of attention on spatial-change tuning. Younger listeners showed not only larger responses overall but a greater dynamic range in their response to location changes. Results suggest that younger listeners were acquiring and encoding key spatial cues at early cortical processing areas. On the other hand, each group exhibited modulatory effects of attention to spatial-change tuning, indicating that both younger and older listeners selectively attend to space in a manner that amplifies the available signal.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In complex acoustic scenes, listeners take advantage of spatial cues to selectively attend to sounds that are deemed immediately relevant. At the neural level, selective attention amplifies electrical responses to spatial changes. We tested whether older and younger listeners have comparable modulatory effects of attention to stimuli moving in the free field. Results indicate that although older listeners do have depressed overall responses, selective attention enhances spatial-change tuning in younger and older listeners alike.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; electrophysiology; localization; spatial hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34288759      PMCID: PMC8461830          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00609.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.974


  84 in total

Review 1.  Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model.

Authors:  Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-03

2.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.

Authors:  Penny Anderson Gosselin; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment.

Authors:  Brigitte A Lavoie; Jemma E Hine; Roger D Thornton
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Feature-selective attention in healthy old age: a selective decline in selective attention?

Authors:  Cliodhna Quigley; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Sophia E Kramer; Mark A Eckert; Brent Edwards; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Larry E Humes; Ulrike Lemke; Thomas Lunner; Mohan Matthen; Carol L Mackersie; Graham Naylor; Natalie A Phillips; Michael Richter; Mary Rudner; Mitchell S Sommers; Kelly L Tremblay; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Reduced temporal processing in older, normal-hearing listeners evident from electrophysiological responses to shifts in interaural time difference.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann C Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Individual differences in attentional modulation of cortical responses correlate with selective attention performance.

Authors:  Inyong Choi; Le Wang; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  1 in total

1.  Large group differences in binaural sensitivity are represented in preattentive responses from auditory cortex.

Authors:  Angkana Lertpoompunya; Erol J Ozmeral; Nathan C Higgins; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.