AIM: To evaluate the educational effectiveness of a clinically integrated e-learning course for teaching basic evidence-based medicine (EBM) among postgraduate medical trainees compared to a traditional lecture-based course of equivalent content. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to compare a clinically integrated e-learning EBM course (intervention) to a lecture-based course (control) among postgraduate trainees at foundation or internship level in seven teaching hospitals in the UK West Midlands region. Knowledge gain among participants was measured with a validated instrument using multiple choice questions. Change in knowledge was compared between groups taking into account the cluster design and adjusted for covariates at baseline using generalized estimating equations (GEE) model. RESULTS: There were seven clusters involving teaching of 237 trainees (122 in the intervention and 115 in the control group). The total number of postgraduate trainees who completed the course was 88 in the intervention group and 72 in the control group. After adjusting for baseline knowledge, there was no difference in the amount of improvement in knowledge of EBM between the two groups. The adjusted post course difference between the intervention group and the control group was only 0.1 scoring points (95% CI -1.2-1.4). CONCLUSION: An e-learning course in EBM was as effective in improving knowledge as a standard lecture-based course. The benefits of an e-learning approach need to be considered when planning EBM curricula as it allows standardization of teaching materials and is a potential cost-effective alternative to standard lecture-based teaching.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To evaluate the educational effectiveness of a clinically integrated e-learning course for teaching basic evidence-based medicine (EBM) among postgraduate medical trainees compared to a traditional lecture-based course of equivalent content. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to compare a clinically integrated e-learning EBM course (intervention) to a lecture-based course (control) among postgraduate trainees at foundation or internship level in seven teaching hospitals in the UK West Midlands region. Knowledge gain among participants was measured with a validated instrument using multiple choice questions. Change in knowledge was compared between groups taking into account the cluster design and adjusted for covariates at baseline using generalized estimating equations (GEE) model. RESULTS: There were seven clusters involving teaching of 237 trainees (122 in the intervention and 115 in the control group). The total number of postgraduate trainees who completed the course was 88 in the intervention group and 72 in the control group. After adjusting for baseline knowledge, there was no difference in the amount of improvement in knowledge of EBM between the two groups. The adjusted post course difference between the intervention group and the control group was only 0.1 scoring points (95% CI -1.2-1.4). CONCLUSION: An e-learning course in EBM was as effective in improving knowledge as a standard lecture-based course. The benefits of an e-learning approach need to be considered when planning EBM curricula as it allows standardization of teaching materials and is a potential cost-effective alternative to standard lecture-based teaching.
Authors: James Davis; Evi Chryssafidou; Javier Zamora; David Davies; Khalid Khan; Arri Coomarasamy Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Sjors F P J Coppus; Jose I Emparanza; Julie Hadley; Regina Kulier; Susanne Weinbrenner; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Amanda Burls; Juan B Cabello; Tamas Decsi; Andrea R Horvath; Marcin Kaczor; Gianni Zanrei; Karin Pierer; Katarzyna Stawiarz; Regina Kunz; Ben W J Mol; Khalid S Khan Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2007-11-27 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Regina Kulier; Julie Hadley; Susanne Weinbrenner; Berrit Meyerrose; Tamas Decsi; Andrea R Horvath; Eva Nagy; Jose I Emparanza; Sjors F P J Coppus; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Amanda Burls; Juan B Cabello; Marcin Kaczor; Gianni Zanrei; Karen Pierer; Katarzyna Stawiarz; Regina Kunz; Ben W J Mol; Khalid S Khan Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: René Aloisio da Costa Vieira; Ana Helena Lopes; Almir José Sarri; Zuleica Caulada Benedetti; Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Catherine A Gao; Rupak Datta; Dana Dunne; Louise-Marie Dembry; Richard A Martinello; Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Sonali D Advani Journal: Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: M Zago; I Martinez Casas; J Pereira; D Mariani; A R Silva; A Casamassima; E Barbosa; F Ferreira; M Ruesseler; G A Bass; L Ponchietti; F Butti; M Marconi; L F Pinheiro Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 3.693