Literature DB >> 26768003

Oncology E-Learning for Undergraduate. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

René Aloisio da Costa Vieira1, Ana Helena Lopes2,3, Almir José Sarri4, Zuleica Caulada Benedetti5, Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira6.   

Abstract

The e-learning education is a promising method, but there are few prospective randomized publications in oncology. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of retention of information in oncology from undergraduate students of physiotherapy. A prospective, controlled, randomized, crossover study, 72 undergraduate students of physiotherapy, from the second to fourth years, were randomized to perform a course of physiotherapy in oncology (PHO) using traditional classroom or e-learning. Students were offered the same content of the subject. The teacher in the traditional classroom model and the e-learning students used the Articulate® software. The course tackled the main issues related to PHO, and it was divided into six modules, 18 lessons, evaluated by 126 questions. A diagnosis evaluation was performed previous to the course and after every module. The sample consisted of 67 students, allocated in groups A (n = 35) and B (n = 32), and the distribution was homogeneous between the groups. Evaluating the correct answers, we observed a limited score in the pre-test (average grade 44.6 %), which has significant (p < 0.001) improvement in post-test evaluation (average grade 73.9 %). The correct pre-test (p = 0.556) and post-test (p = 0.729) evaluation and the retention of information (p = 0.408) were not different between the two groups. The course in PHO allowed significant acquisition of knowledge to undergraduate students, but the level of information retention was statistically similar between the traditional classroom form and the e-learning, a fact that encourages the use of e-learning in oncology. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: REBECU1111-1142-1963.

Keywords:  Education; Education, distance; Education, higher; Oncology; Physical therapy specialty; Teaching and methods

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26768003     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0979-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  37 in total

1.  Experience with the first Internet-based course at the Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo.

Authors:  M de Maio; M C Ferreira
Journal:  Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo       Date:  2001 May-Jun

Review 2.  The medical-care cost burden of obesity.

Authors:  D Thompson; A M Wolf
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 3.  Educating undergraduate medical students about oncology: a literature review.

Authors:  Judith Gaffan; Jane Dacre; Alison Jones
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Oncology for medical students: a European School of Oncology contribution to undergraduate cancer education.

Authors:  N Pavlidis; J B Vermorken; R Stahel; J Bernier; A Cervantes; R Audisio; G Pentheroudakis; A Costa
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Computer-assisted teaching of nutritional anemias and diabetes to first-year medical students.

Authors:  Maciej S Buchowski; Claudia Plaisted; Jane Fort; Steven H Zeisel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Creating teaching objects: a case study of delivering recorded narrations in nursing education.

Authors:  Anecita Gigi Lim; Iain Doherty; Michelle L L Honey
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Case-based e-learning to improve the attitude of medical students towards occupational health, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P B A Smits; L de Graaf; K Radon; A G de Boer; N R Bos; F J H van Dijk; J H A M Verbeek
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Development and impact evaluation of an e-learning radiation oncology module.

Authors:  Joanne Alfieri; Lorraine Portelance; Luis Souhami; Yvonne Steinert; Peter McLeod; Fleure Gallant; Giovanni Artho
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Devising the optimal preclinical oncology curriculum for undergraduate medical students in the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas J DeNunzio; Lija Joseph; Roxane Handal; Ankit Agarwal; Divya Ahuja; Ariel E Hirsch
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Effectiveness of e-learning in continuing medical education for occupational physicians.

Authors:  Nathalie I R Hugenholtz; Einar M de Croon; Paul B Smits; Frank J H van Dijk; Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 1.611

View more
  4 in total

1.  E-learning programs in oncology: a nationwide experience from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Jan Degerfält; Staffan Sjöstedt; Per Fransson; Elisabeth Kjellén; Mads U Werner
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  Digital learning designs in physiotherapy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nina Bjerketveit Ødegaard; Hilde Tinderholt Myrhaug; Tone Dahl-Michelsen; Yngve Røe
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Improved self- and external assessment of the clinical abilities of medical students through structured improvement measures in an internal medicine bedside course.

Authors:  S M Fünger; H Lesevic; S Rosner; I Ott; P Berberat; C Nikendei; C Sonne
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15

4.  Medical Hematology/Oncology Fellows' Perceptions of Online Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Eric K Singhi; Megan M Dupuis; Jeremy A Ross; Alyssa G Rieber; Nishin A Bhadkamkar
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.037

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.