Literature DB >> 20482347

Temporary anchorage device insertion variables: effects on retention.

Joseph S Petrey, Marnie M Saunders, G Thomas Kluemper, Larry L Cunningham, Cynthia S Beeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the influence of temporary anchorage device (TAD) insertion variables on implant retention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred thirty TADs from three companies were placed in synthetic bone replicas at variable depths and angulations and compared. Clinically relevant forces were applied to the TADs until failure of retention occurred.
RESULTS: In all three implants, increased insertion depth increased implant retention. As the distance from the abutment head to the cortical plate increased, the retention of all three implants decreased. A significantly greater force to fail was required for a 90 degrees insertion angle than for 45 degrees or 135 degrees insertion angles. No significant difference was found between the 45 degrees and 135 degrees insertion angles. A significant reduction in force to fail occurred when comparing 90 degrees and 45 degrees oblique insertion angles.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing penetration depth of TADs results in greater retention. Increased abutment head distance from cortical plate leads to decreased retention. Placement of TADs at 90 degrees to the cortical plate is the most retentive insertion angle. Insertion at an oblique angle from the line of force reduces retention of TADs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20482347      PMCID: PMC8966450          DOI: 10.2319/070309-376.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  18 in total

1.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement.

Authors:  C E Misch; Z Qu; M W Bidez
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Yijin Ren; Jaap C Maltha; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  André Büchter; Dirk Wiechmann; Stefan Koerdt; Hans Peter Wiesmann; Josef Piffko; Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.

Authors:  Toru Deguchi; Miho Nasu; Kaoru Murakami; Toshinori Yabuuchi; Hiroshi Kamioka; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Kim; Hee-Sun Yun; Hyun-Do Park; Doo-Hyung Kim; Young-Chel Park
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Y-C Tseng; C-H Hsieh; C-H Chen; Y-S Shen; I-Y Huang; C-M Chen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Managing complex orthodontic problems: the use of implants for anchorage.

Authors:  V G Kokich
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 0.970

8.  The use of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage. Design and clinical application of the orthosystem.

Authors:  H Wehrbein; B R Merz; P Diedrich; J Glatzmaier
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Pull-out strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs.

Authors:  Sarandeep S Huja; Alan S Litsky; F Mike Beck; Kenneth A Johnson; Peter E Larsen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  The possibility of skeletal anchorage.

Authors:  T D Creekmore; M K Eklund
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1983-04
View more
  12 in total

1.  Orthodontic Microimplants Assisted Intrusion of Supra-erupted Maxillary Molar Enabling Osseointegrated Implant Supported Mandibular Prosthesis: Case Reports.

Authors:  Deepak Rai; Saranjeet Singh Bhasin; Sheetal Rai
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-08-02

2.  Root proximity and cortical bone thickness effects on the success rate of orthodontic micro-implants using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Kyung-Inn Min; Sang-Cheol Kim; Kyung-Hwa Kang; Jin-Hyoung Cho; Eon-Hwa Lee; Na-Young Chang; Jong-Moon Chae
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of vertical placement angle on the insertion torque of mini-implants in human alveolar bone.

Authors:  Rafael Ribeiro Maya; Célia Regina Maio Pinzan-Vercelino; Julio de Araujo Gurgel
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

4.  Effects of placement angle and direction of orthopedic force application on the stability of orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Jihye Lee; Ji Young Kim; Yoon Jeong Choi; Kyung-Ho Kim; Chooryung J Chung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Comparative evaluation of insertion torque and mechanical stability for self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic miniscrews - an in vitro study.

Authors:  Michele Tepedino; Francesco Masedu; Claudio Chimenti
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Stability of the anterior arm of three different Hyrax hybrid expanders: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gonzalo de la Iglesia; André Walter; Fernando de la Iglesia; Heinz Winsauer; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018-01

7.  Design characteristics, primary stability and risk of fracture of orthodontic mini-implants: pilot scan electron microscope and mechanical studies.

Authors:  André Walter; Heinz Winsauer; Jordi Marcé-Nogué; Sergi Mojal; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-09-01

8.  Primary Stability of Dental Implants in Low-Density (10 and 20 pcf) Polyurethane Foam Blocks: Conical vs Cylindrical Implants.

Authors:  Luca Comuzzi; Margherita Tumedei; Ana Emilia Pontes; Adriano Piattelli; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal.

Authors:  Maha S Al Amri; Hanadi M Sabban; Doaa H Alsaggaf; Fahad F Alsulaimani; Ghassan A Al-Turki; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 1.526

10.  Evaluation of the effects of photobiomodulation on orthodontic movement of molar verticalization with mini-implant: A randomized double-blind protocol study.

Authors:  Felipe Murakami-Malaquias-Silva; Ellen Perim Rosa; Paulo André Almeida; Tânia Oppido Schalch; Carlos Alberto Tenis; Renata Matalon Negreiros; Ricardo Fidos Horliana; Aguinaldo Silva Garcez; Marcella Ueda R Fernandes; Andre Tortamano; Lara Jansiski Motta; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.