Literature DB >> 16690253

The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.

Y-C Tseng1, C-H Hsieh, C-H Chen, Y-S Shen, I-Y Huang, C-M Chen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the use of mini-implants for skeletal anchorage, and to assess their stability and the causes of failure. Forty-five mini-implants were used in orthodontic treatment. The diameter of the implants was 2mm, and their lengths were 8, 10, 12 and 14mm. The drill procedure was directly through the cortical bone without any incision or flap operation. Two weeks later, a force of 100-200g was applied by an elastometric chain or NiTi coil spring. Risk factors for the failure of mini-implants were examined statistically using the Chi-square or Fisher exact test as applicable. The average placement time of a mini-implant was about 10-15min. Four mini-implants loosened after orthodontic force loading. The overall success rate was 91.1%. The location of the implant was the significant factor related to failure. In conclusion, the mini-implants are easy to insert for skeletal anchorage and could be successful in the control of tooth movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16690253     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  21 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of anchorage capacity between implant and headgear during anterior segment retraction.

Authors:  F Li; H K Hu; J W Chen; Z P Liu; G F Li; S S He; S J Zou; Q S Ye
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  "Safe zones" for miniscrew implant placement in different dentoskeletal patterns.

Authors:  Pajongjit Chaimanee; Boonsiva Suzuki; Eduardo Yugo Suzuki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Intrusion of Maxillary Posterior Teeth by Skeletal Anchorage: A Systematic Review and Case Report with Thin Alveolar Biotype.

Authors:  Avram Manea; Cristian Dinu; Mihaela Băciuţ; Smaranda Buduru; Oana Almășan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Use of orthodontic mini-implants for maxillomandibular fixation in mandibular fracture.

Authors:  Mario Sergio Medeiros Pires; Leandro Calcagno Reinhardt; Guilherme de Marco Antonello; Ricardo Torres do Couto
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2011-12

5.  Temporary anchorage device insertion variables: effects on retention.

Authors:  Joseph S Petrey; Marnie M Saunders; G Thomas Kluemper; Larry L Cunningham; Cynthia S Beeman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Root contact during drilling for microimplant placement. Affect of surgery site and operator expertise.

Authors:  U-Hyeong Cho; Wonjae Yu; Hee-Moon Kyung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Bivariate optimization of orthodontic mini-implant thread height and pitch.

Authors:  Shuning Shen; Yingying Sun; Chen Zhang; Yongjin Yang; Zhiren Li; Xingwei Cai; Yinzhong Duan; Tao Li
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Clinical factors correlated with the success rate of miniscrews in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Nikolaos Topouzelis; Phoebus Tsaousoglou
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.344

9.  A study of success rate of miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in singapore.

Authors:  Song Yi Lin; Yow Mimi; Chew Ming Tak; Foong Kelvin Weng Chiong; Wong Hung Chew
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-03-10

10.  Comparison of success rates of orthodontic mini-screws by the insertion method.

Authors:  Jung Suk Kim; Seong Hwan Choi; Sang Kwon Cha; Jang Han Kim; Hwa Jin Lee; Sang Seon Yeom; Chung Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.