Literature DB >> 16117773

Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

André Büchter1, Dirk Wiechmann, Stefan Koerdt, Hans Peter Wiesmann, Josef Piffko, Ulrich Meyer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and biomechanical outcome of two different titanium mini-implant systems activated with different load regimens. A total of 200 mini-implants (102 Abso Anchor and 98 Dual Top) were placed in the mandible of eight Göttinger minipigs. Two implants each were immediately loaded in opposite direction by various forces (100, 300 or 500 cN) through tension coils. Additionally, three different distances between the neck of the implant and the bone rim (1, 2 and 3 mm) were used. The different load protocols were chosen to evaluate the load-related implant performance. The load was provided by superelastic tension coils, which are known to develop a virtually constant force. Non-loaded implants were used as a reference. Following an experimental loading period of 22 and 70 days half of the minipigs were sacrificed, and implant containing bone specimens evaluated for clinical performance and implant stability. Implant loosing was found to be statistically dependent on the tip moment (TM) at the bone rim. Clinical implant loosing were only present when load exceeded 900 cN mm. No movement of implants through the bone was found in the experimental groups, for any applied loads. Over the two experimental periods the non-loaded implants of one type of implant had a higher stability than those of the loaded implants. Dual Top implants revealed a slightly higher removal torque compared with Abso Anchor implants. Based on the results of this study, immediate loading of mini-implants can be performed without loss of stability when the load-related biomechanics do not exceed an upper limit of TM at the bone rim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16117773     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01149.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  32 in total

1.  In vivo degradation of orthodontic miniscrew implants: surface analysis of as-received and retrieved specimens.

Authors:  Masahiro Iijima; Takeshi Muguruma; Masahiro Kawaguchi; Yoshitaka Yasuda; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Surgical management of fractured orthodontic mini- implant- a case report.

Authors:  Manthan Desai; Anoop Jain; Nida Sumra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-01-01

3.  Direct versus indirect loading of orthodontic miniscrew implants-an FEM analysis.

Authors:  C Holberg; P Winterhalder; N Holberg; I Rudzki-Janson; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Accuracy of torque-limiting devices used for mini-implant placement--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alexander Pauls; Manuel Nienkemper; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Accuracy of torque-limiting devices for mini-implant removal: an in vitro study.

Authors:  A Pauls; M Nienkemper; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Orthodontic mini-implant stability at different insertion depths : Sensitivity of three stability measurement methods.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Natascha Santel; Ralf Hönscheid; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Long-term durability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Mona Aly Abbassy; Ahmed Samir Bakry; Khalid Hashim Zawawi; Ali Habib Hassan
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Expectations, acceptance and preferences of patients in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants: part II: implant removal.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Andreas Jäger; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Patients' and orthodontists' perceptions of miniplates used for temporary skeletal anchorage: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marie A Cornelis; Nicole R Scheffler; Catherine Nyssen-Behets; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Comparison of skeletal and conventional anchorage methods in conjunction with pre-operative decompensation of a skeletal class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Benedict Wilmes; Gudrun Olthoff; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.