Literature DB >> 21540053

Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Dennis L Barbour1.   

Abstract

The auditory system faithfully represents sufficient details from sound sources such that downstream cognitive processes are capable of acting upon this information effectively even in the face of signal uncertainty, degradation or interference. This robust sound source representation leads to an invariance in perception vital for animals to interact effectively with their environment. Due to unique nonlinearities in the cochlea, sound representations early in the auditory system exhibit a large amount of variability as a function of stimulus intensity. In other words, changes in stimulus intensity, such as for sound sources at differing distances, create a unique challenge for the auditory system to encode sounds invariantly across the intensity dimension. This challenge and some strategies available to sensory systems to eliminate intensity as an encoding variable are discussed, with a special emphasis upon sound encoding.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21540053      PMCID: PMC3165138          DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  90 in total

1.  Two mechanisms for transducer adaptation in vertebrate hair cells.

Authors:  J R Holt; D P Corey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rate representation of tones in noise in the inferior colliculus of decerebrate cats.

Authors:  R Ramachandran; K A Davis; B J May
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-09

3.  Shapes and level tolerances of frequency tuning curves in primary auditory cortex: quantitative measures and population codes.

Authors:  M L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Cyrus P Billimoria; Benjamin J Kraus; Rajiv Narayan; Ross K Maddox; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Phosphorylation and inhibition of olfactory adenylyl cyclase by CaM kinase II in Neurons: a mechanism for attenuation of olfactory signals.

Authors:  J Wei; A Z Zhao; G C Chan; L P Baker; S Impey; J A Beavo; D R Storm
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Frequency resolution and spectral integration (critical band analysis) in single units of the cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  G Ehret; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Adaptation of the generator potential in the crayfish stretch receptors under constant length and constant tension.

Authors:  S Nakajima; K Onodera
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Inhibition and level-tolerant frequency tuning in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

Authors:  N Suga; K Tsuzuki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  High-affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase and adenosine localized in sensory organs.

Authors:  F F Borisy; P N Hwang; G V Ronnett; S H Snyder
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1993-05-07       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  The role of sensory adaptation in the retina.

Authors:  S B Laughlin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  16 in total

1.  Robust encoding of stimulus identity and concentration in the accessory olfactory system.

Authors:  Hannah A Arnson; Timothy E Holy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Equalization of odor representations by a network of electrically coupled inhibitory interneurons.

Authors:  Peixin Zhu; Thomas Frank; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Evaluation of techniques used to estimate cortical feature maps.

Authors:  Nalin Katta; Thomas L Chen; Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Odorant concentration differentiator for intermittent olfactory signals.

Authors:  Terufumi Fujiwara; Tomoki Kazawa; Takeshi Sakurai; Ryota Fukushima; Keiro Uchino; Tomoko Yamagata; Shigehiro Namiki; Stephan Shuichi Haupt; Ryohei Kanzaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate.

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Decoding sound level in the marmoset primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Wensheng Sun; Ellisha N Marongelli; Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Selective adaptation to "oddball" sounds by the human auditory system.

Authors:  Andrew J R Simpson; Nicol S Harper; Joshua D Reiss; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A model for non-monotonic intensity coding.

Authors:  Johannes Nehrkorn; Hiromu Tanimoto; Andreas V M Herz; Ayse Yarali
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Tuning of human modulation filters is carrier-frequency dependent.

Authors:  Andrew J R Simpson; Joshua D Reiss; David McAlpine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Midbrain local circuits shape sound intensity codes.

Authors:  Calum Alex Grimsley; Jason Tait Sanchez; Shobhana Sivaramakrishnan
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.