Literature DB >> 15534214

Associative learning shapes the neural code for stimulus magnitude in primary auditory cortex.

Daniel B Polley1, Marc A Heiser, David T Blake, Christoph E Schreiner, Michael M Merzenich.   

Abstract

Since the dawn of experimental psychology, researchers have sought an understanding of the fundamental relationship between the amplitude of sensory stimuli and the magnitudes of their perceptual representations. Contemporary theories support the view that magnitude is encoded by a linear increase in firing rate established in the primary afferent pathways. In the present study, we have investigated sound intensity coding in the rat primary auditory cortex (AI) and describe its plasticity by following paired stimulus reinforcement and instrumental conditioning paradigms. In trained animals, population-response strengths in AI became more strongly nonlinear with increasing stimulus intensity. Individual AI responses became selective to more restricted ranges of sound intensities and, as a population, represented a broader range of preferred sound levels. These experiments demonstrate that the representation of stimulus magnitude can be powerfully reshaped by associative learning processes and suggest that the code for sound intensity within AI can be derived from intensity-tuned neurons that change, rather than simply increase, their firing rates in proportion to increases in sound intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534214      PMCID: PMC528983          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407586101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

1.  Incremental training increases the plasticity of the auditory space map in adult barn owls.

Authors:  Brie A Linkenhoker; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  THE RELATION OF THALAMIC CELL RESPONSE TO PERIPHERAL STIMULI VARIED OVER AN INTENSIVE CONTINUUM.

Authors:  V B MOUNTCASTLE; G F POGGIO; G WERNER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig.

Authors:  J S Bakin; N M Weinberger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1990-12-17       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Psychometric functions for level discrimination.

Authors:  S Buus; M Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys.

Authors:  G H Recanzone; C E Schreiner; M M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Rapid development of learning-induced receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  J M Edeline; P Pham; N M Weinberger
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Topographic representation of tone intensity along the isofrequency axis of cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  P Heil; R Rajan; D R Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Coding of tone-pulse amplitude by single neurons in auditory cortex of albino rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  D P Phillips; J B Kelly
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Topography of intensity tuning in cat primary auditory cortex: single-neuron versus multiple-neuron recordings.

Authors:  M L Sutter; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural correlates of instrumental learning in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  David T Blake; Fabrizio Strata; Anne K Churchland; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  60 in total

1.  Mindfulness meditation training alters cortical representations of interoceptive attention.

Authors:  Norman A S Farb; Zindel V Segal; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Changes in S1 neural responses during tactile discrimination learning.

Authors:  Michael C Wiest; Eric Thomson; Janaina Pantoja; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Perceptual learning in the developing auditory cortex.

Authors:  Shaowen Bao
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Experience-dependent adult cortical plasticity requires cognitive association between sensation and reward.

Authors:  David T Blake; Marc A Heiser; Matthew Caywood; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Nonmonotonic synaptic excitation and imbalanced inhibition underlying cortical intensity tuning.

Authors:  Guangying K Wu; Pingyang Li; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Distributed representation of perceptual categories in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Heesoo Kim; Shaowen Bao
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 8.  Auditory cortex mapmaking: principles, projections, and plasticity.

Authors:  Christoph E Schreiner; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Scopolamine impairs auditory delayed matching-to-sample performance in monkeys.

Authors:  Bethany Plakke; Chi-Wing Ng; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Perceptual and neuronal boundary learned from higher-order stimulus probabilities.

Authors:  Hania Köver; Kirt Gill; Yi-Ting L Tseng; Shaowen Bao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.