Literature DB >> 16672673

Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences.

Daniel B Polley1, Elizabeth E Steinberg, Michael M Merzenich.   

Abstract

The primary sensory cortex is positioned at a confluence of bottom-up dedicated sensory inputs and top-down inputs related to higher-order sensory features, attentional state, and behavioral reinforcement. We tested whether topographic map plasticity in the adult primary auditory cortex and a secondary auditory area, the suprarhinal auditory field, was controlled by the statistics of bottom-up sensory inputs or by top-down task-dependent influences. Rats were trained to attend to independent parameters, either frequency or intensity, within an identical set of auditory stimuli, allowing us to vary task demands while holding the bottom-up sensory inputs constant. We observed a clear double-dissociation in map plasticity in both cortical fields. Rats trained to attend to frequency cues exhibited an expanded representation of the target frequency range within the tonotopic map but no change in sound intensity encoding compared with controls. Rats trained to attend to intensity cues expressed an increased proportion of nonmonotonic intensity response profiles preferentially tuned to the target intensity range but no change in tonotopic map organization relative to controls. The degree of topographic map plasticity within the task-relevant stimulus dimension was correlated with the degree of perceptual learning for rats in both tasks. These data suggest that enduring receptive field plasticity in the adult auditory cortex may be shaped by task-specific top-down inputs that interact with bottom-up sensory inputs and reinforcement-based neuromodulator release. Top-down inputs might confer the selectivity necessary to modify a single feature representation without affecting other spatially organized feature representations embedded within the same neural circuitry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672673      PMCID: PMC6674159          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3771-05.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  248 in total

1.  Reorganization in processing of spectral and temporal input in the rat posterior auditory field induced by environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mindfulness meditation training alters cortical representations of interoceptive attention.

Authors:  Norman A S Farb; Zindel V Segal; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Successive-signal biasing for a learned sound sequence.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhou; Etienne de Villers-Sidani; Rogerio Panizzutti; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Changes in S1 neural responses during tactile discrimination learning.

Authors:  Michael C Wiest; Eric Thomson; Janaina Pantoja; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Ensemble recordings in awake rats: achieving behavioral regularity during multimodal stimulus processing and discriminative learning.

Authors:  Eunjeong Lee; Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira; Ed de Water; Hans Gerritsen; Mattijs C Bakker; Jan A W Kalwij; Tjerk van Goudoever; Wietze H Buster; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Decoding temporal structure in music and speech relies on shared brain resources but elicits different fine-scale spatial patterns.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Anjali Bhatara; Srikanth Ryali; Evan Balaban; Daniel J Levitin; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Stimulus-timing-dependent plasticity of cortical frequency representation.

Authors:  Johannes C Dahmen; Douglas E H Hartley; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Developmentally degraded cortical temporal processing restored by training.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhou; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.