Literature DB >> 20437058

The utility and predictive value of combinations of low penetrance genes for screening and risk prediction of colorectal cancer.

Steven J Hawken1, Celia M T Greenwood, Thomas J Hudson, Rafal Kustra, John McLaughlin, Quanhe Yang, Brent W Zanke, Julian Little.   

Abstract

Despite the fact that colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly treatable form of cancer if detected early, a very low proportion of the eligible population undergoes screening for this form of cancer. Integrating a genomic screening profile as a component of existing screening programs for CRC could potentially improve the effectiveness of population screening by allowing the assignment of individuals to different types and intensities of screening and also by potentially increasing the uptake of existing screening programs. We evaluated the utility and predictive value of genomic profiling as applied to CRC, and as a potential component of a population-based cancer screening program. We generated simulated data representing a typical North American population including a variety of genetic profiles, with a range of relative risks and prevalences for individual risk genes. We then used these data to estimate parameters characterizing the predictive value of a logistic regression model built on genetic markers for CRC. Meta-analyses of genetic associations with CRC were used in building science to inform the simulation work, and to select genetic variants to include in logistic regression model-building using data from the ARCTIC study in Ontario, which included 1,200 CRC cases and a similar number of cancer-free population-based controls. Our simulations demonstrate that for reasonable assumptions involving modest relative risks for individual genetic variants, that substantial predictive power can be achieved when risk variants are common (e.g., prevalence > 20%) and data for enough risk variants are available (e.g., approximately 140-160). Pilot work in population data shows modest, but statistically significant predictive utility for a small collection of risk variants, smaller in effect than age and gender alone in predicting an individual's CRC risk. Further genotyping and many more samples will be required, and indeed the discovery of many more risk loci associated with CRC before the question of the potential utility of germline genomic profiling can be definitively answered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20437058      PMCID: PMC2885303          DOI: 10.1007/s00439-010-0828-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  58 in total

1.  Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Explaining the familial colorectal cancer risk associated with mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient and MMR-stable tumors.

Authors:  Lauri Aaltonen; Louise Johns; Heikki Järvinen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Richard Houlston
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  The impact of genotype frequencies on the clinical validity of genomic profiling for predicting common chronic diseases.

Authors:  A Cecile J W Janssens; Ramal Moonesinghe; Quahne Yang; Ewout W Steyerberg; Cornelia M van Duijn; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Cancer in twins: genetic and nongenetic familial risk factors.

Authors:  A Ahlbom; P Lichtenstein; H Malmström; M Feychting; K Hemminki; N L Pedersen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-02-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.

Authors:  P Lichtenstein; N V Holm; P K Verkasalo; A Iliadou; J Kaprio; M Koskenvuo; E Pukkala; A Skytthe; K Hemminki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Randomized study of biennial screening with a faecal occult blood test: results after nine screening rounds.

Authors:  O Kronborg; O D Jørgensen; C Fenger; M Rasmussen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  An epidemiologic assessment of genomic profiling for measuring susceptibility to common diseases and targeting interventions.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Quanhe Yang; Marta Gwinn; Julian Little; W Dana Flanders
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies four new susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Richard S Houlston; Emily Webb; Peter Broderick; Alan M Pittman; Maria Chiara Di Bernardo; Steven Lubbe; Ian Chandler; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Kate Sullivan; Steven Penegar; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Kimberley Howarth; Emma Jaeger; Sarah L Spain; Axel Walther; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Enric Domingo; Ana S Teixeira; David Kerr; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Iina Niittymäki; Sari Tuupanen; Auli Karhu; Lauri A Aaltonen; Ian P M Tomlinson; Susan M Farrington; Albert Tenesa; James G D Prendergast; Rebecca A Barnetson; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Mary E Porteous; Paul D P Pharoah; Thibaud Koessler; Jochen Hampe; Stephan Buch; Clemens Schafmayer; Jurgen Tepel; Stefan Schreiber; Henry Völzke; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Brent W Zanke; Alexandre Montpetit; Thomas J Hudson; Steven Gallinger; Harry Campbell; Malcolm G Dunlop
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 10.  Is FOB screening really the answer for lowering mortality in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Peter Boyle; Marc Buyse; Harry Bleiberg
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2003
View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  IL6 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  Yong Yu; Wenjun Wang; Song Zhai; Shuangsuo Dang; Mingzhu Sun
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Public attitudes towards genomic risk profiling as a component of routine population screening.

Authors:  S G Nicholls; B J Wilson; S M Craigie; H Etchegary; D Castle; J C Carroll; B K Potter; L Lemyre; J Little
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) Pro12Ala polymorphism and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Yan Shao; Shenhua Tang; Xianyong Cheng; Haifeng Lian; Chengyong Qin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.

Authors:  Dayna R Cenin; Steffie K Naber; Anne C de Weerdt; Mark A Jenkins; David B Preen; Hooi C Ee; Peter C O'Leary; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Modelling optimal use of temporarily restricted colonoscopy capacity in a FIT-based CRC screening program: Application during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lucie de Jonge; Hilliene J van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer; Emilie C H Breekveldt; Manon C W Spaander; Hanneke J van Vuuren; Folkert J van Kemenade; Evelien Dekker; Iris D Nagtegaal; Monique E van Leerdam; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  Expanding Horizons for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Rachel C Rolph; Matthew Waltham; Alberto Smith; Helena Kuivaniemi
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2015-02-01

7.  Genetic variants in IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway and the risk of CRC.

Authors:  Shuwei Wang; Weidong Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-05

8.  Relationship between polymorphisms of the lipid metabolism-related gene PLA2G16 and risk of colorectal cancer in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Xiao-Nv Xie; Jing Yu; Li-Hua Zhang; Zhi-Ying Luo; Dong-Sheng Ouyang; Ling-Jie Zheng; Chun-Yang Wang; Li Yang; Ling Chen; Zhi-Rong Tan
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 3.410

Review 9.  How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases?

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; A Cecile J W Janssens; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Genetic background of patients from a university medical center in Manhattan: implications for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Bamidele O Tayo; Marie Teil; Liping Tong; Huaizhen Qin; Gregory Khitrov; Weijia Zhang; Quinbin Song; Omri Gottesman; Xiaofeng Zhu; Alexandre C Pereira; Richard S Cooper; Erwin P Bottinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.