Literature DB >> 17200375

Explaining the familial colorectal cancer risk associated with mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient and MMR-stable tumors.

Lauri Aaltonen1, Louise Johns, Heikki Järvinen, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Richard Houlston.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of data quantifying the familial risk of colorectal cancer associated with mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient and MMR-stable tumors. To address this, we analyzed a population-based series of 1,042 colorectal cancer probands with verified family histories. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Constitutional DNA from probands was systematically screened for MYH variants and those with cancers displaying microsatellite instability (MSI) for germ-line MMR mutations; diagnoses of familial adenomatous polyposis and juvenile polyposis were established based on clinical phenotype and mutational analysis. Familial colorectal cancer risks were enumerated from age-, sex-, and calendar-specific population incidence rates. Segregation analysis was conducted to derive a model of the residual familial aggregation of colorectal cancer.
RESULTS: Germ-line predisposition to colorectal cancer was identified in 37 probands [3.4%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.4-4.6]: 29 with MLH1/MSH2 mutations, 2 with familial adenomatous polyposis, 1 with juvenile polyposis, and 5 with biallelic MYH variants. The risk of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives of probands with MSI and MMR-stable cancers was increased 5.01-fold (95% CI, 3.73-6.59) and 1.31-fold (95% CI, 1.07-1.59), respectively. MSH2/MLH1 mutations were responsible for 50% of the overall excess familial risk and 80% of the risk associated with MSI cancers but 32% of the familial risk was unaccounted for by known loci. Genetic models based on major gene loci did not provide a better explanation of the residual familial aggregation than a simple polygenic model.
CONCLUSIONS: The information from our analyses should be useful in quantifying familial risks in clinical practice and in the design of studies to identify novel disease alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17200375     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  74 in total

1.  Cancer risks for the relatives of colorectal cancer cases with a methylated MLH1 promoter region: data from the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  A Joan Levine; Aung Ko Win; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark A Jenkins; John A Baron; Joanne P Young; Tiffany I Long; Daniel J Weisenberger; Peter W Laird; Rebecca L McCall; David J Duggan; Robert W Haile
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-12-05

2.  Low-penetrance susceptibility variants in familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Iina Niittymäki; Eevi Kaasinen; Sari Tuupanen; Auli Karhu; Heikki Järvinen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Ian P M Tomlinson; Maria Chiara Di Bernardo; Richard S Houlston; Lauri A Aaltonen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  A genome-wide scan of 10 000 gene-centric variants and colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Emily Webb; Peter Broderick; Steven Lubbe; Ian Chandler; Ian Tomlinson; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Screening participation for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer due to family history: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Trevor Lockett; Alex Boussioutas; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Familial colorectal cancer type X: the other half of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 6.  Serrated pathway colorectal cancer in the population: genetic consideration.

Authors:  Joanne Young; Mark Jenkins; Susan Parry; Bruce Young; Derek Nancarrow; Dallas English; Graham Giles; Jeremy Jass
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Activin receptor-like kinases: a diverse family playing an important role in cancer.

Authors:  Holli A Loomans; Claudia D Andl
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  The utility and predictive value of combinations of low penetrance genes for screening and risk prediction of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Hawken; Celia M T Greenwood; Thomas J Hudson; Rafal Kustra; John McLaughlin; Quanhe Yang; Brent W Zanke; Julian Little
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Allelic variation at the 8q23.3 colorectal cancer risk locus functions as a cis-acting regulator of EIF3H.

Authors:  Alan M Pittman; Silvia Naranjo; Sanni E Jalava; Philip Twiss; Yussanne Ma; Bianca Olver; Amy Lloyd; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Mobshra Qureshi; Peter Broderick; Tom van Wezel; Hans Morreau; Sari Tuupanen; Lauri A Aaltonen; M Eva Alonso; Miguel Manzanares; Angela Gavilán; Tapio Visakorpi; José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  COGENT (COlorectal cancer GENeTics): an international consortium to study the role of polymorphic variation on the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  I P M Tomlinson; M Dunlop; H Campbell; B Zanke; S Gallinger; T Hudson; T Koessler; P D Pharoah; I Niittymäki; I Niittymäkix; S Tuupanen; S Tuupanenx; L A Aaltonen; K Hemminki; A Lindblom; A Försti; O Sieber; L Lipton; T van Wezel; H Morreau; J T Wijnen; P Devilee; K Matsuda; Y Nakamura; S Castellví-Bel; C Ruiz-Ponte; A Castells; A Carracedo; J W C Ho; P Sham; R M W Hofstra; P Vodicka; H Brenner; J Hampe; C Schafmayer; J Tepel; S Schreiber; H Völzke; M M Lerch; C A Schmidt; S Buch; V Moreno; C M Villanueva; P Peterlongo; P Radice; M M Echeverry; A Velez; L Carvajal-Carmona; R Scott; S Penegar; P Broderick; A Tenesa; R S Houlston
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.