Literature DB >> 9048832

Cancer in twins: genetic and nongenetic familial risk factors.

A Ahlbom1, P Lichtenstein, H Malmström, M Feychting, K Hemminki, N L Pedersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Familial clustering has been observed for cancers that occur at specific sites. Most findings, which leave little doubt about the involvement of a heritable (i.e., genetic) component in the development of some cancers, are based on data from "cancer-prone" families or interviews with subjects who have cancer. The study of twins should be of value in cancer epidemiology because twins either are genetically identical or share half of their segregating genes.
PURPOSE: We linked the Swedish Twin Registry to the Swedish Cancer Registry, thereby identifying cases of cancer diagnosed from 1959 through 1992 in twins born in the period from 1886 through 1958, to assess the importance of both genetic and nongenetic (i.e., environmental) familial factors in determining cancer risk.
METHODS: Same-sex twin pairs with both individuals alive and living in Sweden in 1959-1961 or 1970-1972 were identified in the old cohort (born from 1886 through 1925) or the young cohort (born from 1926 through 1958), respectively, of the Swedish Twin Registry; pairs for whom zygosity (i.e., the number of eggs that gave rise to the twins) could be determined were considered further. The association of cancer with combined genetic and nongenetic familial factors was tested by comparing all twin pairs (regardless of zygosity) in which at least one member of the pair had been diagnosed with cancer at one of several specific sites with pairs in which neither twin had that cancer. Heritable effects alone were tested by comparing monozygotic (one egg) and dizygotic (two eggs) twin pairs. Statistical methods used in quantitative genetics and standard methods for epidemiologic research were used in parallel to analyze the data. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: In the 10503 twin pairs from the old cohort, 361.7 cases of malignant cancer were identified; 918 malignant cancers were identified in the 12883 twin pairs from the young cohort. When cancer sites with a total number of at least 200 cases and at least one twin pair concordant (i.e., both twins affected) for the site were evaluated, namely, cancers of the stomach, colon and rectum, lung, female breast, and prostate, as well as total cancer, profound genetic and/or nongenetic familial effects were identified in twins from the old cohort. Similar findings were obtained for twins in the young cohort for cancers of the prostate and female breast, as well as for total cancer. Genetic and nongenetic familial effects were also identified in twins from both cohorts for in situ cancer of the cervix. The increase in risk of colon and rectum, breast, cervical, and especially prostate cancer, but not stomach or lung cancer, tended to be greater if a monozygotic rather than a dizygotic twin were affected. IMPLICATIONS: The identification of familial effects for total cancer in this study is consistent with the idea that individuals may possess a genetic susceptibility to cancer in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9048832     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/89.4.287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  50 in total

1.  A genome screen of multiplex sibships with prostate cancer.

Authors:  B K Suarez; J Lin; J K Burmester; K W Broman; J L Weber; T K Banerjee; K A Goddard; J S Witte; R C Elston; W J Catalona
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in PDCD6 gene are associated with the development of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Peng Bai; Hui Xue; Zhu Zhang; Shaoqing Shi; Kui Zhang; Yanyun Wang; Kana Wang; Yi Quan; Yaping Song; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Cervix smear abnormalities: linking pathology data in female twins, their mothers and sisters.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Vink; Folkert J van Kemenade; Chris J L M Meijer; Mariel K Casparie; Gerrit A Meijer; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  [Familial prostate cancer and genetic predisposition].

Authors:  V H Meissner; M Jahnen; K Herkommer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Perinatal characteristics and breast cancer risk in daughters: a Scandinavian population-based study.

Authors:  R Troisi; T Grotmol; J Jacobsen; S Tretli; H T Sørensen; M Gissler; R Kaaja; N Potischman; A Ekbom; R N Hoover; O Stephansson
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Evidence for autosomal dominant inheritance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  D J Schaid; S K McDonnell; M L Blute; S N Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Familial cervical cancer: case reports, review and clinical implications.

Authors:  Margreet Zoodsma; Rolf H Sijmons; Elisabeth Ge de Vries; Ate Gj van der Zee
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.857

8.  CCR2-V64I polymorphism is associated with increased risk of cervical cancer but not with HPV infection or pre-cancerous lesions in African women.

Authors:  Koushik Chatterjee; Collet Dandara; Margaret Hoffman; Anna-Lise Williamson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A constant risk for familial breast cancer? A population-based family study.

Authors:  Kamila Czene; Marie Reilly; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Fas and FasL gene polymorphisms are not associated with cervical cancer but differ among Black and Mixed-ancestry South Africans.

Authors:  Koushik Chatterjee; Malin Engelmark; Ulf Gyllensten; Collet Dandara; Lize van der Merwe; Ushma Galal; Margaret Hoffman; Anna-Lise Williamson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.