Literature DB >> 12865763

Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.

Sarah E Gollust1, Benjamin S Wilfond, Sara Chandros Hull.   

Abstract

PURPOSE The increasing use of the Internet to obtain genetics information and to order medical services without a prescription, combined with a rise in direct-to-consumer marketing for genetic testing, suggests the potential for the Internet to be used to sell genetic services. METHODS A systematic World Wide Web search was conducted in May 2002 to assess the availability of genetic services sold directly to consumers on the Internet. RESULTS Out of 105 sites that offered genetic services directly, most offered non-health-related services, including parentage confirmation testing (83%), identity testing (56%), and DNA banking (24%); however, health-related genetic tests were offered through 14 sites (13%). The health-related genetic tests available ranged from standard tests, such as hemochromatosis and cystic fibrosis, to more unconventional tests related to nutrition, behavior, and aging. Of these 14 sites, 5 described risks associated with the genetic services and 6 described the availability of counseling. CONCLUSIONS The availability of direct sales of health-related genetic tests creates the potential for inadequate pretest decision making, misunderstanding test results, and access to tests of questionable clinical value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12865763      PMCID: PMC4822819          DOI: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000076972.83711.48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  29 in total

Review 1.  The future of genetic counselling: an international perspective.

Authors:  B Bowles Biesecker; T M Marteau
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  The complexities of predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  J P Evans; C Skrzynia; W Burke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

Review 3.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Where there's a web, there's a way: commercial genetic testing and the Internet.

Authors:  Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2003

5.  Uncertainties in genetic testing for chronic disease.

Authors:  H G Welch; W Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Predictive genetic testing: from basic research to clinical practice.

Authors:  N A Holtzman; P D Murphy; M S Watson; P A Barr
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Impact of educational print materials on knowledge, attitudes, and interest in BRCA1/BRCA2: testing among Ashkenazi Jewish women.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; J Benkendorf; C Lerman; C Isaacs; A Ryan-Robertson; L Johnson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  M J Green; B B Biesecker; A M McInerney; D Mauger; N Fost
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-09-15

Review 9.  Human genetics on the web.

Authors:  A E Guttmacher
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.929

10.  Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science.

Authors:  F S Collins; V A McKusick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Ethics and neuropsychiatric genetics: a review of major issues.

Authors:  Steven K Hoge; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 2.  Are genetic self-tests dangerous? Assessing the commercialization of genetic testing in terms of personal autonomy.

Authors:  Ludvig Beckman
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

3.  Estimating ethnic admixture from pedigree data.

Authors:  Janet S Sinsheimer; Christopher L Plaisier; Adriana Huertas-Vazquez; Carlos Aguilar-Salinas; Teresa Tusie-Luna; Päivi Pajukanta; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.

Authors:  Katrina A B Goddard; Debra Duquette; Amy Zlot; Jenny Johnson; Ann Annis-Emeott; Patrick W Lee; Mary Pat Bland; Karen L Edwards; Kristin Oehlke; Rebecca T Giles; Ann Rafferty; Michelle L Cook; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis.

Authors:  K A B Goddard; J Robitaille; N F Dowling; A R Parrado; J Fishman; L A Bradley; C A Moore; M J Khoury
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Commentary: Children and predictive genomic testing: disease prevention, research protection, and our future.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Kenneth P Tercyak; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-08-04

7.  Science communication reconsidered.

Authors:  Tania Bubela; Matthew C Nisbet; Rick Borchelt; Fern Brunger; Cristine Critchley; Edna Einsiedel; Gail Geller; Anil Gupta; Jürgen Hampel; Robyn Hyde-Lay; Eric W Jandciu; S Ashley Jones; Pam Kolopack; Summer Lane; Tim Lougheed; Brigitte Nerlich; Ubaka Ogbogu; Kathleen O'Riordan; Colin Ouellette; Mike Spear; Stephen Strauss; Thushaanthini Thavaratnam; Lisa Willemse; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Media coverage of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  John Lynch; Ashley Parrott; Robert J Hopkin; Melanie Myers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Genetic susceptibility testing for neurodegenerative diseases: ethical and practice issues.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Wendy R Uhlmann
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Judging risk for multiple diseases: the role of disease worry.

Authors:  Ibrahim Senay; Sharon Hensley-Alford; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2012-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.