Literature DB >> 22041146

Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP Robot).

Andrea Gavazzi1, Ali N Bahsoun, Wim Van Haute, Kamran Ahmed, Oussama Elhage, Peter Jaye, M Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to establish face, content and construct validation of the SEP Robot (SimSurgery, Oslo, Norway) in order to determine its value as a training tool. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The tasks used in the validation of this simulator were arrow manipulation and performing a surgeon's knot. Thirty participants (18 novices, 12 experts) completed the procedures.
RESULTS: The simulator was able to differentiate between experts and novices in several respects. The novice group required more time to complete the tasks than the expert group, especially suturing. During the surgeon's knot exercise, experts significantly outperformed novices in maximum tightening stretch, instruments dropped, maximum winding stretch and tool collisions in addition to total task time. A trend was found towards the use of less force by the more experienced participants.
CONCLUSIONS: The SEP robotic simulator has demonstrated face, content and construct validity as a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. With steady increase in adoption of robotic surgery world-wide, this simulator may prove to be a valuable adjunct to clinical mentorship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22041146      PMCID: PMC3293312          DOI: 10.1308/003588411X12851639108358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  23 in total

1.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents.

Authors:  Sonal Grover; Gerald Y Tan; Abhishek Srivastava; Robert A Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system?

Authors:  Michelle A Lerner; Mikias Ayalew; William J Peine; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Virtual reality simulator training equals mechanical robotic training in improving robot-assisted basic suturing skills.

Authors:  F H Halvorsen; O J Elle; V V Dalinin; B E Mørk; V Sørhus; J S Røtnes; E Fosse
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Advanced da Vinci Surgical System simulator for surgeon training and operation planning.

Authors:  L W Sun; F Van Meer; J Schmid; Y Bailly; A A Thakre; C K Yeung
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Validation of surgical simulators.

Authors:  Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation.

Authors:  Justin M Albani; David I Lee
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Short-phase training on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance in tele-robotic surgery.

Authors:  Indran Balasundaram; Rajesh Aggarwal; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.547

9.  Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Patrick A Kenney; Matthew F Wszolek; Justin J Gould; John A Libertino; Alireza Moinzadeh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; I Crothers; J Browning
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.

Authors:  Justin D Bric; Derek C Lumbard; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Simulation-based training in robot-assisted surgery: current evidence of value and potential trends for the future.

Authors:  Michael I Hanzly; Tareq Al-Tartir; Syed Johar Raza; Atif Khan; Mohammad Manan Durrani; Thomas Fiorica; Phillip Ginsberg; James L Mohler; Boris Kuvshinoff; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.

Authors:  Sandeep Krishan Nayar; Liam Musto; Roland Fernandes; Rasiah Bharathan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Novel Education and Simulation Tools in Urologic Training.

Authors:  Brandon S Childs; Marc D Manganiello; Ruslan Korets
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Face and content validity of analog surgical instruments on a novel physics-driven minimally invasive spinal fusion surgical simulator.

Authors:  Brittany Stott; Mark Driscoll
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.079

7.  Robotic simulation: validation and qualitative assessment of a general surgery resident training curriculum.

Authors:  Mia S Turbati; Matthew I Goldblatt; Jon C Gould; Rana M Higgins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 8.  Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Transfer of arthroscopic skills from computer simulation training to the operating theatre: a review of evidence from two randomised controlled studies.

Authors:  Tarek Boutefnouchet; Thomas Laios
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-02-02

Review 10.  Impact of laparoscopic surgery training laboratory on surgeon's performance.

Authors:  Fabio C M Torricelli; Joao Arthur B A Barbosa; Giovanni S Marchini
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.