Literature DB >> 17169649

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up.

Albert A Mikhail1, Marcelo A Orvieto, Ehab S Billatos, Kevin C Zorn, Edward M Gong, Charles B Brendler, Gregory P Zagaja, Arieh L Shalhav.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report our initial experience of 100 patients with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Continued technological advances have expanded our armamentarium of minimally invasive devices and techniques to offer our patients. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been adopted at many centers.
METHODS: This was a nonrandomized prospective study evaluating our initial 100 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The follow-up data were obtained prospectively using the validated Rand 36-item health survey, version 2, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients who required open conversion were excluded from the outcome analysis. Patients who received a sural nerve graft were excluded from the operative analysis.
RESULTS: The average age and body mass index of all patients were 58.4 years (range 42 to 70) and 28.5 kg/m2 (range 18.1 to 50.6), respectively, with a median follow-up of 12 months. The average prostate-specific antigen level was 6.07 ng/mL. Seven patients required conversion to an open technique, and four underwent sural nerve grafting. The positive surgical margin rate was 16% (15 of 92). Using the Rand 36-item health survey, version 2, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index health surveys, the average percentage of return to baseline urinary function was 52%, 70%, 79%, and 84% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The overall average percentage of return to baseline sexual function was 51%, 58%, 66%, and 80% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe and efficient method for achieving prostate cancer control even during the initial learning curve for this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17169649     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  20 in total

1.  Robotic gastric banding in children and adolescents: a comparative study.

Authors:  Aayed Alqahtani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents.

Authors:  Sonal Grover; Gerald Y Tan; Abhishek Srivastava; Robert A Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  [Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: update 2008].

Authors:  H John
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Robot-assisted pediatric surgery: how far can we go?

Authors:  Aayed Alqahtani; Abdullrahman Albassam; Mohammed Zamakhshary; Mohammed Shoukri; Tariq Altokhais; Ayman Aljazairi; Abdullrhman Alzahim; Mohammed Mallik; Abdullah Alshehri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in 93 cases: Outcomes of the first ERUS robotic urology curriculum trained surgeon in Turkey.

Authors:  Fevzi Bedir; Murat Keske; Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen; Hüseyin Kocatürk; Erdem Koç; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Ali Fuat Atmaca
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-02-04

6.  Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows.

Authors:  Gregory E Tasian; Douglas J Wiebe; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery.

Authors:  Se-Jin Baek; Dong-Woo Lee; Sung-Soo Park; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-10-15

8.  Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Liu; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Ping Chen; Yan Zhao; Hua-Feng Pan; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and technical considerations.

Authors:  Andrea Coratti; Mario Annecchiarico; Michele Di Marino; Edoardo Gentile; Francesco Coratti; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  N L Sharma; N C Shah; D E Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.