Literature DB >> 28108975

3D-printed soft-tissue physical models of renal malignancies for individualized surgical simulation: a feasibility study.

Michael M Maddox1, Allison Feibus1, James Liu1, Julie Wang1, Raju Thomas1, Jonathan L Silberstein2.   

Abstract

To construct patient-specific physical three-dimensional (3D) models of renal units with materials that approximates the properties of renal tissue to allow pre-operative and robotic training surgical simulation, 3D physical kidney models were created (3DSystems, Rock Hill, SC) using computerized tomography to segment structures of interest (parenchyma, vasculature, collection system, and tumor). Images were converted to a 3D surface mesh file for fabrication using a multi-jet 3D printer. A novel construction technique was employed to approximate normal renal tissue texture, printers selectively deposited photopolymer material forming the outer shell of the kidney, and subsequently, an agarose gel solution was injected into the inner cavity recreating the spongier renal parenchyma. We constructed seven models of renal units with suspected malignancies. Partial nephrectomy and renorrhaphy were performed on each of the replicas. Subsequently all patients successfully underwent robotic partial nephrectomy. Average tumor diameter was 4.4 cm, warm ischemia time was 25 min, RENAL nephrometry score was 7.4, and surgical margins were negative. A comparison was made between the seven cases and the Tulane Urology prospectively maintained robotic partial nephrectomy database. Patients with surgical models had larger tumors, higher nephrometry score, longer warm ischemic time, fewer positive surgical margins, shorter hospitalization, and fewer post-operative complications; however, the only significant finding was lower estimated blood loss (186 cc vs 236; p = 0.01). In this feasibility study, pre-operative resectable physical 3D models can be constructed and used as patient-specific surgical simulation tools; further study will need to demonstrate if this results in improvement of surgical outcomes and robotic simulation education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive manufacturing; Nephron sparing surgery; Renal cell carcinoma; Surgical simulation; Three-dimensional models; Three-dimensional printer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108975     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0680-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  19 in total

1.  Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents.

Authors:  Ruslan Korets; Adam C Mues; Joseph A Graversen; Mantu Gupta; Mitchell C Benson; Kimberly L Cooper; Jaime Landman; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R Wolswijk; R P Zweemer; M P Schijven; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 3.  Robotics in urologic surgery: an evolving new technology.

Authors:  Fatih Atug; Erik P Castle; Michael Woods; Rodney Davis; Raju Thomas
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Evaluation of three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of renal tumors: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Hong-wei Ge; Ning-chen Li; Cheng-fan Yu; Hong-feng Guo; Shi-hua Jin; Jin-shun Liu; Yan-qun Na
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Swar H Shah; Leonard Dalag; Daniel Shin; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Robotic surgical simulation.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Use of 3-d stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Pushkar Mehra; Jeremey Miner; Richard D'Innocenzo; Mohammed Nadershah
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-03-04

8.  Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm versus ≤ 4 cm in 445 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Firas Petros; Shyam Sukumar; Georges-Pascal Haber; Lori Dulabon; Sam Bhayani; Michael Stifelman; Jihad Kaouk; Craig Rogers
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Individualized Physical 3-dimensional Kidney Tumor Models Constructed From 3-dimensional Printers Result in Improved Trainee Anatomic Understanding.

Authors:  Margaret Knoedler; Allison H Feibus; Andrew Lange; Michael M Maddox; Elisa Ledet; Raju Thomas; Jonathan L Silberstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Brian R Lane; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Amr Fergany; Igor Frank; Inderbir S Gill; Michael L Blute; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  21 in total

1.  3D imaging applications for robotic urologic surgery: an ESUT YAUWP review.

Authors:  Enrico Checcucci; Daniele Amparore; Cristian Fiori; Matteo Manfredi; Morra Ivano; Michele Di Dio; Gabriel Niculescu; Federico Piramide; Giovanni Cattaneo; Pietro Piazzolla; Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani; Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Imaging in individualized uro-oncology].

Authors:  J Bründl; J Breyer; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Three dimensional models in uro-oncology: a future built with additive fabrication.

Authors:  Todd G Manning; Jonathan S O'Brien; Daniel Christidis; Marlon Perera; Jasamine Coles-Black; Jason Chuen; Damien M Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  3D printing technology and its role in urological training.

Authors:  Brandon Smith; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  An overview on 3D printing for abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Pietrabissa; Stefania Marconi; Erika Negrello; Valeria Mauri; Andrea Peri; Luigi Pugliese; Enrico Maria Marone; Ferdinando Auricchio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  A systematic review of the clinical value and applications of three-dimensional virtual reconstructions in renal tumors.

Authors:  Claudia-Gabriela Moldovanu; Andrei Lebovici; Mircea Marian Buruian
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2022-01-31

7.  Mechanical and functional validation of a perfused, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy simulation platform using a combination of 3D printing and hydrogel casting.

Authors:  Rachel Melnyk; Bahie Ezzat; Elizabeth Belfast; Patrick Saba; Shamroz Farooq; Timothy Campbell; Stephen McAleavey; Mark Buckley; Ahmed Ghazi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Three-dimensional printing versus conventional machining in the creation of a meatal urethral dilator: development and mechanical testing.

Authors:  Michael Y Chen; Jacob Skewes; Ryan Daley; Maria A Woodruff; Nicholas J Rukin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Comparison of 3-Dimensional and Augmented Reality Kidney Models With Conventional Imaging Data in the Preoperative Assessment of Children With Wilms Tumors.

Authors:  Lianne M Wellens; Jene Meulstee; Cornelis P van de Ven; C E J Terwisscha van Scheltinga; Annemieke S Littooij; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Marta Fiocco; Anne C Rios; Thomas Maal; Marc H W A Wijnen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-04-05

10.  Three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with renal tumors.

Authors:  Gang Fan; Yanbin Meng; Shuai Zhu; Mingji Ye; Mingfeng Li; Feiping Li; Yuanchun Ye; Zhizhong Liu; Han Weiqin; Yu Xie
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.