Literature DB >> 12771773

Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique.

Mani Menon1, Ashutosh Tewari, James Peabody.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have performed more than 250 radical prostatectomies using the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, California) surgical system. Our initial cases were done using the classic Montsouris approach. However, after gaining familiarity with the robot we modified our technique to reflect our experience with open radical retropubic prostatectomy. We detail the Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy technique that we currently use.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The robotic technique requires 2 teams, namely a skilled laparoscopic team at the patient and a skilled open surgeon at the console. Dissection is started anterior to the bladder and it continues extraperitoneally. The endopelvic fascia is opened and the dorsal vein complex is secured. The apex of the prostate is dissected free, releasing the neurovascular bundles at the apex. The bladder neck is then incised, and the seminal vesicles and vasa are transected. Posterior dissection is done within the posterior layer of Denonvilliers' fascia, preserving the neurovascular bundles and lateral prostatic fascia. The apex is transected and frozen sections are obtained from the parietal margins. Vesicourethral anastomosis is formed with 2 continuous sutures.
RESULTS: In the last 100 cases mean operative time was 2.5 hours and average blood loss was 150 ml. (range 25 to 525 cc.). Median specimen Gleason score was 7 and mean tumor volume was 7 cc. Four patients had a positive surgical margin, which was focal in 3. Of the patients 95% were discharged home within 23 hours. Mean catheterization time was 4.2 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy is a precise and safe minimally invasive technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771773     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067464.53313.dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  76 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and outcome.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Odysseas Andrikopoulos; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Iason Kyriazis; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents.

Authors:  Sonal Grover; Gerald Y Tan; Abhishek Srivastava; Robert A Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is less stressful than the open approach: results of a contemporary prospective study evaluating pathophysiology of cortisol stress-related kinetics in prostate cancer surgery.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Alberto Molinari; Alessandro Terrin; Nicolò De Luyk; Roberto Baldassarre; Matteo Brunelli; Stefano Cavalleri; Maria Angela Cerruto; Matteo Gelati; Gian Luca Salvagno; Gian Cesare Guidi; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-07-24

4.  Robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: our first case.

Authors:  A Breda; L Gausa; A Territo; J M López-Martínez; O Rodríguez-Faba; J Caffaratti; J Ponce de León; L Guirado; H Villavicencio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Body mass index is an independent predictor of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications in patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy with extensive pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Marco Sebben; Alessandro Tafuri; Nicolò de Luyk; Paolo Corsi; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Riccardo Rizzetto; Nelia Amigoni; Daniele Mattevi; Maria A Cerruto; Matteo Brunelli; Giovanni Novella; Vincenzo De Marco; Filippo Migliorini; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-08

Review 6.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Intensive laparoscopic training: the impact of a simplified pelvic-trainer model for the urethrovesical anastomosis on the learning curve.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle De Vries; Wolfgang Dillenburg; Matthias Moeckel; Eduard Becht
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: evolution from conventional to VIP.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kaul; Mani Menon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Impact of routine use of surgical drains on incidence of complications with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  John E Musser; Melissa Assel; Giuliano B Guglielmetti; Prachee Pathak; Jonathan L Silberstein; Daniel D Sjoberg; Melanie Bernstein; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.