Literature DB >> 20400943

The scaffold protein Ste5 directly controls a switch-like mating decision in yeast.

Mohan K Malleshaiah1, Vahid Shahrezaei, Peter S Swain, Stephen W Michnick.   

Abstract

Evolution has resulted in numerous innovations that allow organisms to increase their fitness by choosing particular mating partners, including secondary sexual characteristics, behavioural patterns, chemical attractants and corresponding sensory mechanisms. The haploid yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae selects mating partners by interpreting the concentration gradient of pheromone secreted by potential mates through a network of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling proteins. The mating decision in yeast is an all-or-none, or switch-like, response that allows cells to filter weak pheromone signals, thus avoiding inappropriate commitment to mating by responding only at or above critical concentrations when a mate is sufficiently close. The molecular mechanisms that govern the switch-like mating decision are poorly understood. Here we show that the switching mechanism arises from competition between the MAPK Fus3 and a phosphatase Ptc1 for control of the phosphorylation state of four sites on the scaffold protein Ste5. This competition results in a switch-like dissociation of Fus3 from Ste5 that is necessary to generate the switch-like mating response. Thus, the decision to mate is made at an early stage in the pheromone pathway and occurs rapidly, perhaps to prevent the loss of the potential mate to competitors. We argue that the architecture of the Fus3-Ste5-Ptc1 circuit generates a novel ultrasensitivity mechanism, which is robust to variations in the concentrations of these proteins. This robustness helps assure that mating can occur despite stochastic or genetic variation between individuals. The role of Ste5 as a direct modulator of a cell-fate decision expands the functional repertoire of scaffold proteins beyond providing specificity and efficiency of information processing. Similar mechanisms may govern cellular decisions in higher organisms and be disrupted in cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20400943     DOI: 10.1038/nature08946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  28 in total

Review 1.  The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation--a 25 year update.

Authors:  P Cohen
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication.

Authors:  P Nash; X Tang; S Orlicky; Q Chen; F B Gertler; M D Mendenhall; F Sicheri; T Pawson; M Tyers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Multisite phosphorylation provides sophisticated regulation of transcription factors.

Authors:  Carina I Holmberg; Stefanie E F Tran; John E Eriksson; Lea Sistonen
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Courtship in S. cerevisiae: both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal.

Authors:  C L Jackson; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways.

Authors:  Megan N McClean; Areez Mody; James R Broach; Sharad Ramanathan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-01-28       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Tuning bulk electrostatics to regulate protein function.

Authors:  Zach Serber; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems.

Authors:  A Goldbeter; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The roles of MAPKs in disease.

Authors:  Michael C Lawrence; Arif Jivan; Chunli Shao; Lingling Duan; Daryl Goad; Elma Zaganjor; Jihan Osborne; Kathleen McGlynn; Steve Stippec; Svetlana Earnest; Wei Chen; Melanie H Cobb
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 25.617

9.  A central role for JNK in obesity and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Jiro Hirosumi; Gürol Tuncman; Lufen Chang; Cem Z Görgün; K Teoman Uysal; Kazuhisa Maeda; Michael Karin; Gökhan S Hotamisligil
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Direct inhibition of the yeast cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28-Cln by Far1.

Authors:  M Peter; I Herskowitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  96 in total

1.  Composite low affinity interactions dictate recognition of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Sic1 by the SCFCdc4 ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Xiaojing Tang; Stephen Orlicky; Tanja Mittag; Veronika Csizmok; Tony Pawson; Julie D Forman-Kay; Frank Sicheri; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Diversity in genetic in vivo methods for protein-protein interaction studies: from the yeast two-hybrid system to the mammalian split-luciferase system.

Authors:  Bram Stynen; Hélène Tournu; Jan Tavernier; Patrick Van Dijck
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  Type 2C protein phosphatases in fungi.

Authors:  Joaquín Ariño; Antonio Casamayor; Asier González
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-11-12

4.  Do cells make decisions based on uncertainty in their biochemical networks?

Authors:  Pavel Kraikivski
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Ultrasensitivity in independent multisite systems.

Authors:  Shane Ryerson; Germán A Enciso
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 6.  Origins of regulated cell-to-cell variability.

Authors:  Berend Snijder; Lucas Pelkmans
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Mixed mechanisms of multi-site phosphorylation.

Authors:  Thapanar Suwanmajo; J Krishnan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Compartmentalization of a bistable switch enables memory to cross a feedback-driven transition.

Authors:  Andreas Doncic; Oguzhan Atay; Ervin Valk; Alicia Grande; Alan Bush; Gustavo Vasen; Alejandro Colman-Lerner; Mart Loog; Jan M Skotheim
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  CDK and MAPK Synergistically Regulate Signaling Dynamics via a Shared Multi-site Phosphorylation Region on the Scaffold Protein Ste5.

Authors:  María Victoria Repetto; Matthew J Winters; Alan Bush; Wolfgang Reiter; David Maria Hollenstein; Gustav Ammerer; Peter M Pryciak; Alejandro Colman-Lerner
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  The calcineurin signaling network evolves via conserved kinase-phosphatase modules that transcend substrate identity.

Authors:  Aaron Goldman; Jagoree Roy; Bernd Bodenmiller; Stefanie Wanka; Christian R Landry; Ruedi Aebersold; Martha S Cyert
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.