Literature DB >> 2257622

Courtship in S. cerevisiae: both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal.

C L Jackson1, L H Hartwell.   

Abstract

We demonstrate that during the courtship stage of conjugation, S. cerevisiae a cells choose the alpha cell producing the highest level of pheromone from among potential mating partners. From this result and that for alpha cells we conclude that both a and alpha cells act as signaling cells during courtship, that both cell types respond by discriminating different levels of signal, and that the signals are the mating pheromones. Responding cells that are supersensitive to signal fail to discriminate pheromone-producing from nonproducing cells to an extent that depends on their degree of supersensitivity. We propose that partner selection in S. cerevisiae results from polarized morphogenesis of a responding cell in the direction of highest pheromone concentration and that cells defective in discriminating this gradient execute a default pathway in which an adjacent cell is selected at random.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2257622     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90507-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  95 in total

1.  Genetic analysis of default mating behavior in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Dorer; C Boone; T Kimbrough; J Kim; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A quantitative characterization of the yeast heterotrimeric G protein cycle.

Authors:  Tau-Mu Yi; Hiroaki Kitano; Melvin I Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Asymmetry in sexual pheromones is not required for ascomycete mating.

Authors:  Joana Gonçalves-Sá; Andrew Murray
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The mating-specific Galpha interacts with a kinesin-14 and regulates pheromone-induced nuclear migration in budding yeast.

Authors:  Sofia V Zaichick; Metodi V Metodiev; Scott A Nelson; Oleksii Durbrovskyi; Edward Draper; John A Cooper; David E Stone
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Genetically engineered transvestites reveal novel mating genes in budding yeast.

Authors:  Lori B Huberman; Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Sexual agglutination in budding yeasts: structure, function, and regulation of adhesion glycoproteins.

Authors:  P N Lipke; J Kurjan
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-03

Review 7.  Chemical gradients and chemotropism in yeast.

Authors:  Robert A Arkowitz
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  The cost of gene expression underlies a fitness trade-off in yeast.

Authors:  Gregory I Lang; Andrew W Murray; David Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  AKR1 encodes a candidate effector of the G beta gamma complex in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway and contributes to control of both cell shape and signal transduction.

Authors:  P M Pryciak; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Analysis of the structural genes encoding M-factor in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe: identification of a third gene, mfm3.

Authors:  S Kjaerulff; J Davey; O Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.