Literature DB >> 27837303

Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Infants Undergoing Ventricular Septal Defect Repair with Median Sternotomy or Minimally Invasive Right Thoracotomy.

Ding Han1, Ya-Guang Liu2, Yi Luo3, Jia Li4, Chuan Ou-Yang5,6.   

Abstract

Fluid management is challenging in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) derived from pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) is based on lung-heart interaction during mechanical ventilation. A prospective observational study conducted in operating room tested PPV to predict fluid responsiveness in ventricular septal defect infants. Infants in open chest conditions with median sternotomy (n = 26) or minimally invasive right thoracotomy (n = 29) undergoing ventricular septal defect repair were enrolled. After cardiopulmonary bypass and modified ultrafiltration, all patients received fluid challenge. PPV was recorded using PRAM along with heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, stroke volume index (SVI), and cardiac index (CI) before and after volume replacement. Patients were considered as responders to fluid loading when CI increased ≥15%. In infants with median sternotomy, 12 were responders and 14 non-responders. PPV in responders was higher than that in non-responders (24.7 ± 6.4 vs. 16.6 ± 5.0%, P < 0.01). Area under the curve was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-1, P = 0.001) and cutoff value 19% with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 71%. In infants with minimally invasive right thoracotomy, 16 were responders and 13 non-responders. PPV in responders was higher than that in non-responders (25.0 ± 6.8 vs. 18.2 ± 5.3, P < 0.01). Area under the curve was 0.83 (95 confidence interval, 0.66-0.98, P = 0.001) and cutoff value 18% with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 69%. PPV sensitively predicts fluid responsiveness in ventricular septal defect infants after surgical repair in open chest conditions both with median sternotomy and minimally invasive right thoracotomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluid responsiveness; Infants; Open heart; Pressure recording analytical method; Pulse pressure variation; Ventricular septal defect

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27837303     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-016-1500-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  19 in total

1.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices.

Authors:  X Monnet; M Dres; A Ferré; G Le Teuff; M Jozwiak; A Bleibtreu; M-C Le Deley; D Chemla; C Richard; J-L Teboul
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions.

Authors:  D A Reuter; M S G Goepfert; T Goresch; M Schmoeckel; E Kilger; A E Goetz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  The circulatory effects of the Valsalva manoeuvre during anaesthesia and thoracotomy.

Authors:  D B Scott; K B Slawson; S H Taylor
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 10.787

5.  Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow velocity as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in children after repair of ventricular septal defect.

Authors:  Deok Young Choi; Hyun Jeong Kwak; Hee Yeon Park; Yong Beom Kim; Chang Hyu Choi; Ji Yeon Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery using thoracotomy: randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Lee; Yunseok Jeon; Jae-Hyon Bahk; Nam-Su Gil; Deok Man Hong; Jun Hyun Kim; Hyun Joo Kim
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Marco Calamandrei; Lorenzo Mirabile; Stefania Muschetta; Gian Franco Gensini; Luciano De Simone; Salvatore M Romano
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Effects of mid-line thoracotomy on the interaction between mechanical ventilation and cardiac filling during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  D A Reuter; T Goresch; M S G Goepfert; S M Wildhirt; E Kilger; A E Goetz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Pressure recording analytical method and bioreactance for stroke volume index monitoring during pediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Cristiana Garisto; Isabella Favia; Zaccaria Ricci; Stefano Romagnoli; Roberta Haiberger; Angelo Polito; Paola Cogo
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by Stroke Volume Variation in Children Undergoing Fontan Operation.

Authors:  Yun'an Song; Huiyan Hou; Jie Bai; Hongbin Gu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of hemodynamic effects of sevoflurane and ketamine as basal anesthesia by a new and direct monitoring during induction in children with ventricular septal defect: A prospective, randomized research.

Authors:  Ding Han; Ya-Guang Liu; Shoudong Pan; Yi Luo; Jia Li; Chuan Ou-Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.