Literature DB >> 17056952

Variations in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography during mechanical ventilation.

Giuseppe Natalini1, Antonio Rosano, Maria E Franceschetti, Paola Facchetti, Achille Bernardini.   

Abstract

We analyzed ventilation-induced changes in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography from waveforms obtained by monitoring 57 patients in the operating room and intensive care unit. Analysis of systolic and pulse pressure variations during positive pressure ventilation, DeltaUp, DeltaDown, and changes in the preejection period on both arterial and photoplethysmographic waveforms were possible in 49 (86%) patients. The pulse pressure variation and preejection period were similar when calculated using both arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography, whereas the other variables were different. Photoplethysmographic pulse variation >9% identified patients with arterial pulse pressure variation >13% (area under ROC curve = 0.85) or DeltaDown >5 mm Hg (area under ROC curve = 0.85). In hypotensive patients, photoplethysmographic pulse variation >9% remained the best threshold value (pulse pressure variation >13%: area under ROC curve = 0.90; DeltaDown >5 mm Hg: area under ROC curve = 0.93) for predicting fluid responsiveness. In conclusion, this study showed that pulse variations observed in the arterial pressure waveform and photoplethysmogram are similiar in response to positive pressure ventilation. Furthermore, photoplethysmographic pulse variation > 9% identifies patients with ventilation-induced arterial blood pressure variation that is likely to respond to fluid administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17056952     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000202380.22997.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  13 in total

1.  Pulse oximeter plethysmograph variation and its relationship to the arterial waveform in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors:  J R Chandler; E Cooke; C Petersen; W Karlen; N Froese; J Lim; J M Ansermino
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Measuring venous oxygenation using the photoplethysmograph waveform.

Authors:  Zachary D Walton; Panayiotis A Kyriacou; David G Silverman; Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Evaluation of Surgical Pleth Index and Analgesia Nociception Index as surrogate pain measures in conscious postoperative patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Lee; Byung-Moon Choi; Yu-Ri Jung; Yong-Hun Lee; Ji-Yeon Bang; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  The analysis of transesophageal oxygen saturation photoplethysmography from different signal sources.

Authors:  Ling Mou; Quan Gong; Wei Wei; Bo Gao
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Characteristics of respiratory measures in young adults scanned at rest, including systematic changes and "missed" deep breaths.

Authors:  Jonathan D Power; Charles J Lynch; Marc J Dubin; Benjamin M Silver; Alex Martin; Rebecca M Jones
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Evaluation of fluid responsiveness: is photoplethysmography a noninvasive alternative?

Authors:  Lars Prag Antonsen; Knut Arvid Kirkebøen
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-28

8.  Pulse oximetry wave variation as a noninvasive tool to assess volume status in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Glauco A Westphal; Eliezer Silva; Anderson Roman Gonçalves; Milton Caldeira Filho; Luíz F Poli-de-Figueiredo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Increasing signal processing sophistication in the calculation of the respiratory modulation of the photoplethysmogram (DPOP).

Authors:  Paul S Addison; Rui Wang; Alberto A Uribe; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Calculation of the Respiratory Modulation of the Photoplethysmogram (DPOP) Incorporating a Correction for Low Perfusion.

Authors:  Paul S Addison; Rui Wang; Scott J McGonigle; Alberto A Uribe; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.