PURPOSE: To estimate the α/β ratio of prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation only by use of a model of long-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dynamics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Repeated measures of PSA from 5,093 patients from 6 institutions treated for localized prostate cancer by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) without planned androgen deprivation were analyzed. A biphasic linear mixed model described the post-treatment evolution of PSA, rather than a conventional model of time to biochemical recurrence. The model was adjusted for standard prognostic factors (T stage, initial PSA level, and Gleason score) and cohort-specific effects. The radiation dose fractionation effect was estimated from the long-term rate of rise of PSA level. RESULTS: Adjusted for other factors, total dose of EBRT and sum of squared doses per fraction were associated with long-term rate of change of PSA level (p = 0.0017 and p = 0.0003, respectively), an increase of each being associated with a lower rate of rise. The α/β ratio was estimated at 1.55 Gy (95% confidence band, 0.46-4.52 Gy). This estimate was robust to adjustment of the linear mixed model. CONCLUSIONS: By analysis of a large EBRT-only cohort along with a method that uses all the repeated measures of PSA after the end of treatment, a low and precise α/β was estimated. These data support the use of hypofractionation at fractional doses up to 2.8 Gy but cannot presently be assumed to accurately represent higher doses per fraction. Crown
PURPOSE: To estimate the α/β ratio of prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation only by use of a model of long-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dynamics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Repeated measures of PSA from 5,093 patients from 6 institutions treated for localized prostate cancer by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) without planned androgen deprivation were analyzed. A biphasic linear mixed model described the post-treatment evolution of PSA, rather than a conventional model of time to biochemical recurrence. The model was adjusted for standard prognostic factors (T stage, initial PSA level, and Gleason score) and cohort-specific effects. The radiation dose fractionation effect was estimated from the long-term rate of rise of PSA level. RESULTS: Adjusted for other factors, total dose of EBRT and sum of squared doses per fraction were associated with long-term rate of change of PSA level (p = 0.0017 and p = 0.0003, respectively), an increase of each being associated with a lower rate of rise. The α/β ratio was estimated at 1.55 Gy (95% confidence band, 0.46-4.52 Gy). This estimate was robust to adjustment of the linear mixed model. CONCLUSIONS: By analysis of a large EBRT-only cohort along with a method that uses all the repeated measures of PSA after the end of treatment, a low and precise α/β was estimated. These data support the use of hypofractionation at fractional doses up to 2.8 Gy but cannot presently be assumed to accurately represent higher doses per fraction. Crown
Authors: Eric E Yeoh; Richard H Holloway; Robert J Fraser; Rochelle J Botten; Addolorata C Di Matteo; Julie Butters; Sujeeva Weerasinghe; Prasad Abeysinghe Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-09-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David J Brenner; Alvaro A Martinez; Gregory K Edmundson; Christina Mitchell; Howard D Thames; Elwood P Armour Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Cécile Proust-Lima; Jeremy M G Taylor; Scott G Williams; Donna P Ankerst; Ning Liu; Larry L Kestin; Kyounghwa Bae; Howard M Sandler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Scott G Williams; Jeremy M G Taylor; Ning Liu; Yolande Tra; Gillian M Duchesne; Larry L Kestin; Alvaro Martinez; Gary R Pratt; Howard Sandler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Philip S Boonstra; Jeremy M G Taylor; Beata Smolska-Ciszewska; Katarzyna Behrendt; Tomasz Dworzecki; Marzena Gawkowska-Suwinska; Brygida Bialas; Rafal Suwinski Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Giuseppe Ferrera; Gianluca Mortellaro; Mariella Mannino; Giovanni Caminiti; Antonio Spera; Vanessa Figlia; Giuseppina Iacoviello; Gioacchino Di Paola; Rosario Mazzola; Antonio Lo Casto; Filippo Alongi; Maria Pia Pappalardo; Roberto Lagalla Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-05-24 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Scott C Morgan; Karen Hoffman; D Andrew Loblaw; Mark K Buyyounouski; Caroline Patton; Daniel Barocas; Soren Bentzen; Michael Chang; Jason Efstathiou; Patrick Greany; Per Halvorsen; Bridget F Koontz; Colleen Lawton; C Marc Leyrer; Daniel Lin; Michael Ray; Howard Sandler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas P Kole; Michael Tong; Binbin Wu; Siyuan Lei; Olusola Obayomi-Davies; Leonard N Chen; Simeng Suy; Anatoly Dritschilo; Ellen Yorke; Sean P Collins Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: M Geier; S T Astner; M N Duma; V Jacob; C Nieder; J Putzhammer; C Winkler; M Molls; H Geinitz Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-02-26 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Mbéry Sène; Jeremy Mg Taylor; James J Dignam; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda; Cécile Proust-Lima Journal: Stat Methods Med Res Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 3.021