Literature DB >> 11777617

Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low alpha/beta ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue.

David J Brenner1, Alvaro A Martinez, Gregory K Edmundson, Christina Mitchell, Howard D Thames, Elwood P Armour.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A direct approach to the question of whether prostate tumors have an atypically high sensitivity to fractionation (low alpha/beta ratio), more typical of the surrounding late-responding normal tissue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Earlier estimates of alpha/beta for prostate cancer have relied on comparing results from external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy, an approach with significant pitfalls due to the many differences between the treatments. To circumvent this, we analyze recent data from a single EBRT + high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy protocol, in which the brachytherapy was given in either 2 or 3 implants, and at various doses. For the analysis, standard models of tumor cure based on Poisson statistics were used in conjunction with the linear-quadratic formalism. Biochemical control at 3 years was the clinical endpoint. Patients were matched between the 3 HDR vs. 2 HDR implants by clinical stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, length of follow-up, and age.
RESULTS: The estimated value of alpha/beta from the current analysis of 1.2 Gy (95% CI: 0.03, 4.1 Gy) is consistent with previous estimates for prostate tumor control. This alpha/beta value is considerably less than typical values for tumors (> or =8 Gy), and more comparable to values in surrounding late-responding normal tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides strong supporting evidence that alpha/beta values for prostate tumor control are atypically low, as indicated by previous analyses and radiobiological considerations. If true, hypofractionation or HDR regimens for prostate radiotherapy (with appropriate doses) should produce tumor control and late sequelae that are at least as good or even better than currently achieved, with the added possibility that early sequelae may be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11777617     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02664-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  132 in total

Review 1.  [Optimizing the use of radiotherapy with IMRT and image guided location of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Lohr; M Fuss; U Tiefenbacher; M Siegsmund; S Mai; J M Kunnappallil; B Dobler; P Alken; F Wenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  [Phase I dose-escalation study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Bremer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Exploring two two-edged swords.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Dosimetric benefits of hemigland stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Amar U Kishan; Sang J Park; Christopher R King; Kristofer Roberts; Patrick A Kupelian; Michael L Steinberg; Mitchell Kamrava
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  SBRT and extreme hypofractionation: A new era in prostate cancer treatments?

Authors:  Filippo Alongi; Alba Fiorentino; Berardino De Bari
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-10-22

7.  Impact of prolonged fraction dose-delivery time modeling intensity-modulated radiation therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma cell killing.

Authors:  Xiao-Kang Zheng; Long-Hua Chen; Xiao Yan; Hong-Mei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Amy S Harrison; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Timothy N Showalter; Mark D Hurwitz; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Systematic review of hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Nitin Ohri; Timothy N Showalter; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  [Brachytherapy of the prostate cancer].

Authors:  S H Stübinger; R Wilhelm; S Kaufmann; M Döring; S Hautmann; K P Jünemann; R Galalae
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.