Literature DB >> 24997620

Who benefits from hypofractionated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: evidence from meta-analysis.

Libin Sun, Linbin Sun1, Shimiao Zhu, Yang Zhao, Hui Zhang, Zhiqun Shang, Ning Jiang, Gang Li, Yuanjie Niu.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the oncological outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library prior to April 2014 and references of relevant original papers and review articles. Unpublished data from meeting abstracts were supplemented. Studies comparing hypofractionated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) on oncological outcomes of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were included. Twelve distinct datasets involving 4,572 participants from 13 papers were eligible for this meta-analysis. The biochemical failure rate (BFR) decreases significantly in the hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) group for approximately 30 % (11-43 %). However, no significantly lower prostate cancer-specific survival and overall survival in HFRT group were observed. In subgroup analyses, HFRT without radiation doses reduction was especially effective in controlling BFR (HR = 0.71, 95 % CI 0.53-0.95; P = 0.02). Compared to CFRT, HFRT only yield a consistent advantage on BFR in high-risk patients (HR = 0.61, 95 % CI 0.46-0.82; P = 0.001). Moreover, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) had no effect on two radiotherapies in controlling BFR. HFRT improves biochemical failure-free survival in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Further well-designed trial is needed to confirm our findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24997620     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2297-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  32 in total

1.  Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David Dearnaley; Isabel Syndikus; Georges Sumo; Margaret Bidmead; David Bloomfield; Catharine Clark; Annie Gao; Shama Hassan; Alan Horwich; Robert Huddart; Vincent Khoo; Peter Kirkbride; Helen Mayles; Philip Mayles; Olivia Naismith; Chris Parker; Helen Patterson; Martin Russell; Christopher Scrase; Chris South; John Staffurth; Emma Hall
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

3.  Updated results and patterns of failure in a randomized hypofractionation trial for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Arcangeli; Lidia Strigari; Sara Gomellini; Biancamaria Saracino; Maria Grazia Petrongari; Paola Pinnarò; Valentina Pinzi; Giorgio Arcangeli
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Update: NCCN prostate cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Peter Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Systematic reviews on rehabilitation interventions.

Authors:  Helen H Handoll
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  A randomized trial comparing hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma: a report on the first-year biochemical response.

Authors:  Darius Norkus; Albert Miller; Aista Plieskiene; Ernestas Janulionis; Konstantinas Povilas Valuckas
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy.

Authors:  Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: final results of phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  Eric E Yeoh; Rochelle J Botten; Julie Butters; Addolorata C Di Matteo; Richard H Holloway; Jack Fowler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Dose-fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5,969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9-2.2) Gy.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Stephen A Roberts; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Jolyon H Hendry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Jack F Fowler; Mark A Ritter; Rick J Chappell; David J Brenner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.