Literature DB >> 24847900

Individualized dynamic prediction of prostate cancer recurrence with and without the initiation of a second treatment: Development and validation.

Mbéry Sène1,2, Jeremy Mg Taylor3, James J Dignam4,5, Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda1,2, Cécile Proust-Lima6,2.   

Abstract

With the emergence of rich information on biomarkers after treatments, new types of prognostic tools are being developed: dynamic prognostic tools that can be updated at each new biomarker measurement. Such predictions are of interest in oncology where after an initial treatment, patients are monitored with repeated biomarker data. However, in such setting, patients may receive second treatments to slow down the progression of the disease. This paper aims to develop and validate dynamic individual predictions that allow the possibility of a new treatment in order to help understand the benefit of initiating new treatments during the monitoring period. The prediction of the event in the next x years is done under two scenarios: (1) the patient initiates immediately a second treatment, (2) the patient does not initiate any treatment in the next x years. Predictions are derived from shared random-effect models. Applied to prostate cancer data, different specifications for the dependence between the prostate-specific antigen repeated measures, the initiation of a second treatment (hormonal therapy), and the risk of clinical recurrence are investigated and compared. The predictive accuracy of the dynamic predictions is evaluated with two measures (Brier score and prognostic cross-entropy) for which approximated cross-validated estimators are proposed.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brier score; dynamic predictions; hormonal treatment; joint model; prognostic cross-entropy; prostate cancer; shared random-effect models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24847900      PMCID: PMC4676739          DOI: 10.1177/0962280214535763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  19 in total

1.  Choice of prognostic estimators in joint models by estimating differences of expected conditional Kullback-Leibler risks.

Authors:  Daniel Commenges; Benoit Liquet; Cécile Proust-Lima
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Simultaneously modelling censored survival data and repeatedly measured covariates: a Gibbs sampling approach.

Authors:  C L Faucett; D C Thomas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Dynamic predictions and prospective accuracy in joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data.

Authors:  Dimitris Rizopoulos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error.

Authors:  M S Wulfsohn; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Joint latent class models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review.

Authors:  Cécile Proust-Lima; Mbéry Séne; Jeremy M G Taylor; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  The effect of salvage therapy on survival in a longitudinal study with treatment by indication.

Authors:  Edward H Kennedy; Jeremy M G Taylor; Douglas E Schaubel; Scott Williams
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Real-time individual predictions of prostate cancer recurrence using joint models.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Yongseok Park; Donna P Ankerst; Cecile Proust-Lima; Scott Williams; Larry Kestin; Kyoungwha Bae; Tom Pickles; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Development and validation of a dynamic prognostic tool for prostate cancer recurrence using repeated measures of posttreatment PSA: a joint modeling approach.

Authors:  Cécile Proust-Lima; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  8 in total

1.  DYNAMIC PREDICTION FOR MULTIPLE REPEATED MEASURES AND EVENT TIME DATA: AN APPLICATION TO PARKINSON'S DISEASE.

Authors:  Jue Wang; Sheng Luo; Liang Li
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Dynamic predictions in Bayesian functional joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: An application to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Kan Li; Sheng Luo
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Dynamic Risk Prediction via a Joint Frailty-Copula Model and IPD Meta-Analysis: Building Web Applications.

Authors:  Takeshi Emura; Hirofumi Michimae; Shigeyuki Matsui
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.738

4.  Joint modelling of longitudinal and multi-state processes: application to clinical progressions in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Loïc Ferrer; Virginie Rondeau; James Dignam; Tom Pickles; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda; Cécile Proust-Lima
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Dynamic prediction of Alzheimer's disease progression using features of multiple longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data.

Authors:  Kan Li; Sheng Luo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Joint models for dynamic prediction in localised prostate cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  Harry Parr; Emma Hall; Nuria Porta
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.612

7.  An adjustable predictive score of graft survival in kidney transplant patients and the levels of risk linked to de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.

Authors:  Aurélie Prémaud; Matthieu Filloux; Philippe Gatault; Antoine Thierry; Matthias Büchler; Eliza Munteanu; Pierre Marquet; Marie Essig; Annick Rousseau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Individualized dynamic prediction of survival with the presence of intermediate events.

Authors:  Grigorios Papageorgiou; Mostafa M Mokhles; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Dimitris Rizopoulos
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.