Literature DB >> 17517328

Is the alpha/beta value for prostate tumours low enough to be safely used in clinical trials?

A Daşu1.   

Abstract

There has been an intense debate over the past several years on the relevant alpha/beta value that could be used to describe the fractionation response of prostate tumours. Previously it has been assumed that prostate tumours have high alpha/beta values, similar to most other tumours and the early reacting normal tissues. However, the proliferation behaviour of the prostate tumours is more like that of the late reacting tissues, with slow doubling times and low alpha/beta values. The analyses of clinical results carried out in the past few years have indeed suggested that the alpha/beta value that characterises the fractionation response of the prostate is low, possibly even below the 3 Gy commonly assumed for most late complications, and hence that hypofractionation of the radiation treatment might improve the therapeutic ratio (better control at the same or lower complication rate). However, hypofractionation might also increase the complication rates in the surrounding late responding tissues and if their alpha/beta value is not larger that of prostate tumours it could even lead to a decrease in the therapeutic ratio. Therefore, the important question is whether the alpha/beta value for the prostate is lower than the alpha/beta values of the surrounding late responding tissues at risk. This paper reviews the clinical and experimental data regarding the radiobiological differential that might exist between prostate tumours and the late normal tissues around them. Several prospective hypofractionated trials that have been initiated recently in order to determine the alpha/beta value or the range of values that describe the fractionation response of prostate tumours are also reviewed. In spite of several confounding factors that interfere with the derivation of a precise value, it seems that most data support a trend towards lower alpha/beta values for prostate tumours than for rectum or bladder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17517328     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  42 in total

1.  SBRT and extreme hypofractionation: A new era in prostate cancer treatments?

Authors:  Filippo Alongi; Alba Fiorentino; Berardino De Bari
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-10-22

2.  Hypofractionation results in reduced tumor cell kill compared to conventional fractionation for tumors with regions of hypoxia.

Authors:  David J Carlson; Paul J Keall; Billy W Loo; Zhe J Chen; J Martin Brown
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Radiotherapy: encouraging early data for SBRT in prostate cancer.

Authors:  May Abdel-Wahab; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  A comparison of HDR brachytherapy and IMRT techniques for dose escalation in prostate cancer: a radiobiological modeling study.

Authors:  M Fatyga; J F Williamson; N Dogan; D Todor; J V Siebers; R George; I Barani; M Hagan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Radiobiological comparison of two radiotherapy treatment techniques for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trinitat García Hernández; Aurora Vicedo González; Jorge Pastor Peidro; Juan V Roselló Ferrando; Luis Brualla González; Domingo Granero Cabañero; José López Torrecilla
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-02-08

6.  Confirmation of a low α/β ratio for prostate cancer treated by external beam radiation therapy alone using a post-treatment repeated-measures model for PSA dynamics.

Authors:  Cécile Proust-Lima; Jeremy M G Taylor; Solène Sécher; Howard Sandler; Larry Kestin; Tom Pickles; Kyoungwha Bae; Roger Allison; Scott Williams
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Phase I dose-escalation study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas P Boike; Yair Lotan; L Chinsoo Cho; Jeffrey Brindle; Paul DeRose; Xian-Jin Xie; Jingsheng Yan; Ryan Foster; David Pistenmaa; Alida Perkins; Susan Cooley; Robert Timmerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan J Katz; Michael Santoro; Richard Ashley; Ferdinand Diblasio; Matthew Witten
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Hypofractionated radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Víctor Macías; Albert Biete
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  A dosimetric selectivity intercomparison of HDR brachytherapy, IMRT and helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Johanne Hermesse; Sylvie Biver; Nicolas Jansen; Eric Lenaerts; Nathalie De Patoul; Stefaan Vynckier; Philippe Coucke; Pierre Scalliet; Philippe Nickers
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.