Literature DB >> 22367410

Dose-escalated simultaneous integrated-boost treatment of prostate cancer patients via helical tomotherapy.

M Geier1, S T Astner, M N Duma, V Jacob, C Nieder, J Putzhammer, C Winkler, M Molls, H Geinitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to assess the feasibility of moderately hypofractionated simultaneous integrated-boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with helical tomotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer regarding acute side effects and dose-volume histogram data (DVH data).
METHODS: Acute side effects and DVH data were evaluated of the first 40 intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with a definitive daily image-guided SIB-IMRT protocol via helical tomotherapy in our department. The planning target volume including the prostate and the base of the seminal vesicles with safety margins was treated with 70 Gy in 35 fractions. The boost volume containing the prostate and 3 mm safety margins (5 mm craniocaudal) was treated as SIB to a total dose of 76 Gy (2.17 Gy per fraction). Planning constraints for the anterior rectal wall were set in order not to exceed the dose of 76 Gy prescribed to the boost volume. Acute toxicity was evaluated prospectively using a modified CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) score.
RESULTS: SIB-IMRT allowed good rectal sparing, although the full boost dose was permitted to the anterior rectal wall. Median rectum dose was 38 Gy in all patients and the median volumes receiving at least 65 Gy (V65), 70 Gy (V70), and 75 Gy (V75) were 13.5%, 9%, and 3%, respectively. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Acute grade 3 toxicity was observed in 20% of patients involving nocturia only. Grade 2 acute intestinal and urological side effects occurred in 25% and 57.5%, respectively. No correlation was found between acute toxicity and the DVH data.
CONCLUSION: This institutional SIB-IMRT protocol using daily image guidance as a precondition for smaller safety margins allows dose escalation to the prostate without increasing acute toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22367410     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-012-0081-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  38 in total

1.  Toxicity after intensity-modulated, image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Sami Ok; Bülent Polat; Reinhart A Sweeney; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Dosimetric advantages of IMRT simultaneous integrated boost for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  X Allen Li; Jian Z Wang; Paul A Jursinic; Colleen A Lawton; Dian Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy.

Authors:  Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A study to quantify the effectiveness of daily endorectal balloon for prostate intrafraction motion management.

Authors:  Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Neha Vapiwala; Curtiland Deville; John P Plastaras; Ryan Scheuermann; Haibo Lin; Voika Bar Ad; Zelig Tochner; Stefan Both
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Dosimetry and preliminary acute toxicity in the first 100 men treated for prostate cancer on a randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven J Feigenberg; Andre A Konski; Benjamin Movsas; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; C-M Charlie Ma; Shawn W McNeeley; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert A Price
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09.

Authors:  Anthony L Zietman; Kyounghwa Bae; Jerry D Slater; William U Shipley; Jason A Efstathiou; John J Coen; David A Bush; Margie Lunt; Daphna Y Spiegel; Rafi Skowronski; B Rodney Jabola; Carl J Rossi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Acute toxicity in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with androgen suppression and hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nadeem Pervez; Cormac Small; Marc MacKenzie; Don Yee; Matthew Parliament; Sunita Ghosh; Alina Mihai; John Amanie; Albert Murtha; Colin Field; David Murray; Gino Fallone; Robert Pearcey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Jack F Fowler; Mark A Ritter; Rick J Chappell; David J Brenner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Prediction of radial distance of extraprostatic extension from pretherapy factors.

Authors:  David J Schwartz; Shomik Sengupta; David W Hillman; Daniel J Sargent; John C Cheville; Torrence M Wilson; Lance A Mynderse; Richard Choo; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: Cleveland Clinic experience.

Authors:  Patrick A Kupelian; Twyla R Willoughby; Chandana A Reddy; Eric A Klein; Arul Mahadevan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  18 in total

1.  Prostate positioning using cone-beam computer tomography based on manual soft-tissue registration: interobserver agreement between radiation oncologists and therapists.

Authors:  B A Jereczek-Fossa; C Pobbiati; L Santoro; C Fodor; P Fanti; S Vigorito; G Baroni; D Zerini; O De Cobelli; R Orecchia
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost by helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer: monoinstitutional report of acute tolerability assessment with different toxicity scales.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ferrera; Gianluca Mortellaro; Mariella Mannino; Giovanni Caminiti; Antonio Spera; Vanessa Figlia; Giuseppina Iacoviello; Gioacchino Di Paola; Rosario Mazzola; Antonio Lo Casto; Filippo Alongi; Maria Pia Pappalardo; Roberto Lagalla
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Impact of different setup approaches in image-guided radiotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer: a study of 2940 setup deviations in 980 MVCTs.

Authors:  Kilian Schiller; Alessia Petrucci; Hans Geinitz; Tibor Schuster; Hanno Specht; Severin Kampfer; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Design and implementation of a "cheese" phantom-based Tomotherapy TLD dose intercomparison.

Authors:  Hans Schiefer; Konrad Buchauer; Simon Heinze; Guido Henke; Ludwig Plasswilm
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Adaptive off-line protocol for prostate external radiotherapy with cone beam computer tomography.

Authors:  M Piziorska; P Kukołowicz; A Zawadzka; M Pilichowska; P Pęczkowski
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Toxicity and outcome of pelvic IMRT for node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  A-C Müller; J Lütjens; M Alber; F Eckert; M Bamberg; D Schilling; C Belka; U Ganswindt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost with volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) for prostate cancer. Report of feasibility and acute toxicity.

Authors:  F Alongi; A Fogliata; P Navarria; A Tozzi; P Mancosu; F Lobefalo; G Reggiori; A Clivio; L Cozzi; M Scorsetti
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Erectile dysfunction after prostate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Correlation with the dose to the penile bulb.

Authors:  A Magli; M Giangreco; M Crespi; A Negri; T Ceschia; G De Giorgi; F Titone; G Parisi; S Fongione
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 9.  Intraoperative Period and Breast Cancer: Review.

Authors:  Arzu Akan; Şerife Şimsek
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2014-10-01

10.  Impact of inter- and intrafraction deviations and residual set-up errors on PTV margins. Different alignment techniques in 3D conformal prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  T Langsenlehner; C Döller; P Winkler; G Gallé; K S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.