Literature DB >> 20373447

Breathheld autocalibrated phase-contrast imaging.

Calvin Lew1, Marcus T Alley, Daniel M Spielman, Roland Bammer, Frandics P Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA), modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE), and SENSE in phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) applications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aliasing of the torso can occur in PC-MRI applications. If the data are further undersampled for parallel imaging, SENSE can be problematic in correctly unaliasing signals due to coil sensitivity maps that do not match that of the aliased volume. Here, a method for estimating coil sensitivities in flow applications is described. Normal volunteers (n = 5) were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI scanner and underwent PC-MRI scans using GRAPPA, mSENSE, SENSE, and conventional PC-MRI acquisitions. Peak velocity and flow through the aorta and pulmonary artery were evaluated.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman statistics for flow in the aorta and pulmonary artery acquired with mSENSE and GRAPPA methods (R = 2 and R = 3 cases) have comparable mean differences to flow acquired with conventional PC-MRI. GRAPPA and mSENSE PC-MRI have more robust measurements than SENSE when there is aliasing artifact caused by insufficient coil sensitivity maps. For peak velocity, there are no considerable differences among the mSENSE, GRAPPA, and SENSE reconstructions and are comparable to conventional PC-MRI.
CONCLUSION: Flow measurements of images reconstructed with autocalibration techniques have comparable agreement with conventional PC-MRI and provide robust measurements in the presence of wraparound. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20373447      PMCID: PMC2903748          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  22 in total

1.  Quantification of left to right atrial shunts with velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L D Brenner; G R Caputo; G Mostbeck; D Steiman; M Dulce; M D Cheitlin; M O'Sullivan; C B Higgins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  UNFOLD-SENSE: a parallel MRI method with self-calibration and artifact suppression.

Authors:  Bruno Madore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  N J Pelc; R J Herfkens; A Shimakawa; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Magn Reson Q       Date:  1991-10

Review 4.  Doppler US. Part I. Basic principles, instrumentation, and pitfalls.

Authors:  K J Taylor; S Holland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Heart disease: functional evaluation with MR imaging.

Authors:  C B Higgins; H Sakuma
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Morphological evaluation of atrioventricular septal defects by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J M Parsons; E J Baker; R H Anderson; E J Ladusans; A Hayes; S A Qureshi; P B Deverall; N Fagg; A Cook; M N Maisey
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-08

8.  Magnetic resonance volume flow and jet velocity mapping in aortic coarctation.

Authors:  R H Mohiaddin; P J Kilner; S Rees; D B Longmore
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Flow volume and shunt quantification in pediatric congenital heart disease by real-time magnetic resonance velocity mapping: a validation study.

Authors:  Hermann Körperich; Jürgen Gieseke; Peter Barth; Romhild Hoogeveen; Hermann Esdorn; Andreas Peterschröder; Hans Meyer; Philipp Beerbaum
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Assessment of left-to-right intracardiac shunting by velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison with oximetric and indicator dilution techniques.

Authors:  W G Hundley; H F Li; R A Lange; D P Pfeifer; B M Meshack; J E Willard; C Landau; D Willett; L D Hillis; R M Peshock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Parallel MR imaging.

Authors:  Anagha Deshmane; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Acceleration of tissue phase mapping with sensitivity encoding at 3T.

Authors:  Anja Lutz; Axel Bornstedt; Robert Manzke; Patrick Etyngier; G Ulrich Nienhaus; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Volker Rasche
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.364

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.