BACKGROUND: Flow quantification in real time by phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) may provide unique hemodynamic information in congenital heart disease, but available techniques have important limitations. We sought to validate a novel real-time magnetic resonance flow sequence in children. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 14 pediatric patients (mean age 5.2+/-2.0 years) with cardiac left-to-right shunt, pulmonary (Q(p)) and aortic (Q(s)) flow rates were determined by nontriggered free-breathing real-time PC-MRI with single-shot echo-planar imaging combined with sensitivity encoding, which yielded 25 phase images per second at 2.7x2.7-mm in-plane resolution (field of view 30x34 cm2). Over a 9.5-second period that included 2 to 5 respiratory cycles, 16.6+/-2.6 subsequent stroke volumes (range 13 to 22) were acquired in each vessel. Results were compared with conventional retrospectively ECG-gated PC-MRI. Mean Q(p)/Q(s) by conventional PC-MRI was 1.91+/-0.64, and it was 1.94+/-0.68 (mean+/-SD) by real-time PC-MRI. For blood flow rate through pulmonary artery and aorta, we found differences of 2% to 3% (Bland-Altman analysis), with lower limits of agreement of -11% to -13% (mean-2 SD) and upper limits of 18% to 19% (mean+2 SD), which demonstrated good agreement between both methods. Mean difference for Q(p)/Q(s) was 1%, with limits of agreement ranging between -18% and 22% (mean+/-2 SD). High repeatability but some flow overestimation was observed in vitro (pulsatile flow phantom) with real-time PC-MRI, whereas conventional PC-MRI was accurate. Beat-to-beat stroke-volume variation was 6.1+/-2.3% in vivo and 3.7+/-0.3% in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Beat-to-beat quantification of pulmonary and aortic flows and hence left-to-right shunt within a few seconds is reliable by nontriggered real-time PC-MRI with echo-planar imaging and sensitivity encoding. Good spatial/temporal resolution and a large field of view may render the sequence valuable for multiple applications in congenital heart disease.
BACKGROUND: Flow quantification in real time by phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) may provide unique hemodynamic information in congenital heart disease, but available techniques have important limitations. We sought to validate a novel real-time magnetic resonance flow sequence in children. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 14 pediatric patients (mean age 5.2+/-2.0 years) with cardiac left-to-right shunt, pulmonary (Q(p)) and aortic (Q(s)) flow rates were determined by nontriggered free-breathing real-time PC-MRI with single-shot echo-planar imaging combined with sensitivity encoding, which yielded 25 phase images per second at 2.7x2.7-mm in-plane resolution (field of view 30x34 cm2). Over a 9.5-second period that included 2 to 5 respiratory cycles, 16.6+/-2.6 subsequent stroke volumes (range 13 to 22) were acquired in each vessel. Results were compared with conventional retrospectively ECG-gated PC-MRI. Mean Q(p)/Q(s) by conventional PC-MRI was 1.91+/-0.64, and it was 1.94+/-0.68 (mean+/-SD) by real-time PC-MRI. For blood flow rate through pulmonary artery and aorta, we found differences of 2% to 3% (Bland-Altman analysis), with lower limits of agreement of -11% to -13% (mean-2 SD) and upper limits of 18% to 19% (mean+2 SD), which demonstrated good agreement between both methods. Mean difference for Q(p)/Q(s) was 1%, with limits of agreement ranging between -18% and 22% (mean+/-2 SD). High repeatability but some flow overestimation was observed in vitro (pulsatile flow phantom) with real-time PC-MRI, whereas conventional PC-MRI was accurate. Beat-to-beat stroke-volume variation was 6.1+/-2.3% in vivo and 3.7+/-0.3% in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Beat-to-beat quantification of pulmonary and aortic flows and hence left-to-right shunt within a few seconds is reliable by nontriggered real-time PC-MRI with echo-planar imaging and sensitivity encoding. Good spatial/temporal resolution and a large field of view may render the sequence valuable for multiple applications in congenital heart disease.
Authors: Jan M Sohns; Johannes T Kowallick; Arun A Joseph; K Dietmar Merboldt; Dirk Voit; Martin Fasshauer; Wieland Staab; Jens Frahm; Joachim Lotz; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2015-10
Authors: Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-07-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Anoosh Esmaeili; Rene Höhn; Arne Koch; Thomas Josef Vogl; Roland Hofstetter; Nasreddin Abolmaali Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2006-07-14 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Erasmo de la Pena; Patricia K Nguyen; Krishna S Nayak; Phillip C Yang; David N Rosenthal; Bob S Hu; John M Pauly; Michael V McConnell Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2006 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Eugénie Marie-Christine Riesenkampff; Boris Schmitt; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Michael Huebler; Vladimir Alexi-Meskishvili; Roland Hetzer; Felix Berger; Titus Kuehne Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 1.655