Literature DB >> 8227813

Magnetic resonance volume flow and jet velocity mapping in aortic coarctation.

R H Mohiaddin1, P J Kilner, S Rees, D B Longmore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Nuclear magnetic resonance (MRI) velocity mapping was used to characterize flow waveforms and to measure volume flow in the ascending and descending thoracic aorta in patients with aortic coarctation and in healthy volunteers. We present the method and discuss the relation between these measurements and aortic narrowing assessed by MRI. Finally, we compare coarctation jet velocity measured by MRI velocity mapping with that obtained from continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.
BACKGROUND: The development of a noninvasive imaging method for morphologic visualization of aortic coarctation and for measurement of its impact on blood flow is highly desirable in the preoperative and postoperative management of patients.
METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging phase-shift velocity mapping was used to measure ascending and descending aortic volume flow in 39 patients with aortic coarctation and in 12 healthy volunteers. Magnetic resonance imaging was also used for anatomic and peak jet velocity measurements. The latter were compared with those available from continuous wave Doppler study in 40% of the patients.
RESULTS: Whereas ascending aortic volume flow measurement did not show significant differences between the patient and healthy control groups, volume flow curves in the descending aorta did show significant differences between the two groups. Peak volume flow (mean +/- SD) was 10.6 +/- 5.3 liters/min in patients and 19.6 +/- 4.7 liters/min in control subjects (p < 0.001). Time-averaged flow was 2.5 +/- 0.9 liters/min in patients and 3.9 +/- 1.1 liters/min in control subjects (p < 0.05). The descending/ascending aorta flow ratio was 0.47 +/- 0.19 in patients and 0.64 +/- 0.08 in control subjects (p < 0.05). These variables correlate well with the degree of aortic narrowing. Peak coarctation jet velocity measured by MRI velocity mapping is comparable to that obtained from continuous wave Doppler study (r = 0.95).
CONCLUSIONS: We established normal ranges for volume flow in the descending aorta and demonstrated abnormalities in patients with aortic coarctation. These abnormalities are likely to be related to resistance to flow imposed by the coarctation and could represent an additional index for monitoring patients before and after intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8227813     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90565-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  24 in total

1.  Prevalence of associated cardiovascular abnormalities in 500 patients with aortic coarctation referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to a tertiary center.

Authors:  Lynette L S Teo; Tim Cannell; Sonya V Babu-Narayan; Marina Hughes; Raad H Mohiaddin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Interdependencies of aortic arch secondary flow patterns, geometry, and age analysed by 4-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Alexander Berger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Maximilian F Russe; Jelena Bock; Andreas Harloff; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Optimal imaging protocol for evaluation of aortic coarctation; time for a reappraisal.

Authors:  B J M Mulder; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Peak velocity and flow quantification validation for sensitivity-encoded phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  Calvin D Lew; Marcus T Alley; Roland Bammer; Daniel M Spielman; Frandics P Chan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on vascular imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Victor A Ferrari; Corey Goldman; John R Lesser; Edward T Martin; Sanjay Rajagopalan; John P Reilly; George P Rodgers; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease in children.

Authors:  A E Schlesinger; R J Hernandez
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

7.  Volumetric velocity measurements in restricted geometries using spiral sampling: a phantom study.

Authors:  Anders Nilsson; Johan Revstedt; Einar Heiberg; Freddy Ståhlberg; Karin Markenroth Bloch
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Breathheld autocalibrated phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Calvin Lew; Marcus T Alley; Daniel M Spielman; Roland Bammer; Frandics P Chan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Congenital diseases of the thoracic aorta. Role of MRI and MRA.

Authors:  Vincenzo Russo; Matteo Renzulli; Cesare La Palombara; Rossella Fattori
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Flow and myocardial interaction: an imaging perspective.

Authors:  Guang-Zhong Yang; Robert Merrifield; Sharmeen Masood; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.