Literature DB >> 7796506

Assessment of left-to-right intracardiac shunting by velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison with oximetric and indicator dilution techniques.

W G Hundley1, H F Li, R A Lange, D P Pfeifer, B M Meshack, J E Willard, C Landau, D Willett, L D Hillis, R M Peshock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to provide an accurate assessment of shunt magnitude in patients with large atrial septal defects, but its ability to determine shunt magnitude in patients with intracardiac left-to-right shunts of various locations and sizes has not been evaluated in a prospective and blinded manner. The objective of the present study was to determine whether velocity-encoded, phase-difference MRI can assess the magnitude of intracardiac left-to-right shunting in humans. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-one subjects (15 women and 6 men; age range, 15 to 72 years) underwent velocity-encoded, phase-difference MRI measurements of flow in the proximal aorta and pulmonary artery, followed immediately by cardiac catheterization. The presence of left-to-right intracardiac shunting was assessed with hydrogen inhalation, after which shunt magnitude was measured by the oximetric and indocyanine green techniques. Of the 21 patients, 12 had left-to-right intracardiac shunting detected by hydrogen inhalation. There was a good correlation (r = .94) between the invasive and MRI assessments of shunt magnitude. In comparison to oximetry and indocyanine green, MRI correctly identified the 12 patients with a ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow (Qp/Qs) of < 1.5 (9 without intracardiac shunting and 3 with small shunts) and the 9 patients with a Qp/Qs of > or = 1.5 (6 with atrial septal defect, 1 with ventricular septal defect, 1 with patent ductus arteriosus, and 1 with both atrial septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with measurements obtained during cardiac catheterization, velocity-encoded, phase-difference MRI measurements of flow in the proximal great vessels can reliably assess the magnitude of intracardiac left-to-right shunting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7796506     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.12.2955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  32 in total

1.  Quantification of shunt volumes in congenital heart diseases using a breath-hold MR phase contrast technique--comparison with oximetry.

Authors:  Steffen E Petersen; Thomas Voigtländer; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; Peter Kalden; Thomas Wittlinger; Jürgen Scharhag; Georg Horstick; Dietmar Becker; Gerhard Hommel; Manfred Thelen; Jürgen Meyer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Evaluation of intracardiac shunts with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  [Cardiovascular MRT--replacement of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography?].

Authors:  S Kelle; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Assessment of shunt volumes in children with ventricular septal defects: comparative quantification of MR flow measurements and invasive oximetry.

Authors:  Anoosh Esmaeili; Rene Höhn; Arne Koch; Thomas Josef Vogl; Roland Hofstetter; Nasreddin Abolmaali
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Peak velocity and flow quantification validation for sensitivity-encoded phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  Calvin D Lew; Marcus T Alley; Roland Bammer; Daniel M Spielman; Frandics P Chan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Assessment of intracardiac shunt by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R H Mohaiddin
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-09

9.  Accuracy of conventional oximetry for flow estimation in patients with superior cavopulmonary connection: a comparison with phase-contrast cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Tacy E Downing; Kevin K Whitehead; Yoav Dori; Matthew J Gillespie; Matthew A Harris; Mark A Fogel; Jonathan J Rome; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Aortic stiffness increases upon receipt of anthracycline chemotherapy.

Authors:  Narumol Chaosuwannakit; Ralph D'Agostino; Craig A Hamilton; Kimberly S Lane; William O Ntim; Julia Lawrence; Susan A Melin; Leslie R Ellis; Frank M Torti; William C Little; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.