Literature DB >> 18580207

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.

Norbert Hüser1, Christoph W Michalski, Mert Erkan, Tibor Schuster, Robert Rosenberg, Jörg Kleeff, Helmut Friess.   

Abstract

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The role of a defunctioning stoma in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer is still the subject of controversy. Recent studies suggest reduced morbidity after low anterior rectal resection with a defunctioning stoma.
METHODS: Retrospective and prospective studies published between 1966 and 2007 were systematically reviewed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anterior resections with or without defunctioning stoma were included in a meta-analysis. The pooled estimates of clinically relevant anastomotic leakages and of reoperations were analyzed using a random effects model (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval, CI).
RESULTS: Relevant retrospective single (n = 18) and multicenter (n = 9) studies were identified and included in the systematic review. Analysis of incoherent data of the leakage rates in these nonrandomized studies demonstrated that a defunctioning stoma did not influence the occurrence of anastomotic failure but seemed to ameliorate the consequences of the leak. Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio for clinically relevant anastomotic leakage was 0.32 (95% CI 0.17-0.59), revealing a statistically significant benefit conferred through a defunctioning stoma (Z = 3.65, P = 0.0003). The odds ratio for reoperation because of leakage-caused complications was 0.27 (95% CI 0.14-0.51), with significantly fewer reoperations in patients with a defunctioning stoma (Z = 3.95, P < 0.0001). Overall mortality rates were comparable regardless of the presence of a defunctioning stoma.
CONCLUSION: A defunctioning stoma reduces the rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakages and is thus recommended in surgery for low rectal cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18580207     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  169 in total

1.  Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?

Authors:  Art Hiranyakas; Assar Rather; Giovanna da Silva; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  I Mantzoros
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  [Protective ileostoma versus protective transverse stoma. What evidence is available?].

Authors:  C D Klink; S Willis; U P Neumann; M Jansen
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients.

Authors:  Matteo Frasson; Pablo Granero-Castro; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Blas Flor-Lorente; Mariela Braithwaite; Eva Martí Martínez; Jose Antonio Álvarez Pérez; Antonio Codina Cazador; Alejandro Espí; Eduardo Garcia-Granero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hong Zhi Geng; Dilidan Nasier; Bing Liu; Hua Gao; Yi Ke Xu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Use of Sodium Hyaluronate/Carboxymethylcellulose Bioresorbable Membrane in Loop Ileostomy Construction Facilitates Stoma Closure.

Authors:  Danielle M Bertoni; Kerry L Hammond; David E Beck; Terry C Hicks; Charles B Whitlow; H David Vargas; David A Margolin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

8.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms. How I do it.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Simone Arolfo; Mario Caldart; Fabrizio Rebecchi; Mario Morino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Koichi Tamura; Kenji Matsuda; Shozo Yokoyama; Hiromitsu Iwamoto; Yuki Mizumoto; Daisuke Murakami; Yuki Nakamura; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Integrated approach to colorectal anastomotic leakage: Communication, infection and healing disturbances.

Authors:  Cloë L Sparreboom; Zhou-Qiao Wu; Jia-Fu Ji; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.