Literature DB >> 23053455

A comparative study of patients with and without associated digestive surgery in a two-stage hepatectomy setting.

Mattia Stella1, Aurélien Dupre, Sylvie Chabaud, Alessandro Gandini, Pierre Meeus, Patrice Peyrat, Michel Rivoire.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the feasibility and outcomes of two-stage hepatectomy in patients with or without accompanying digestive surgery.
METHODS: We analyzed prospectively data from 56 patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing two-stage hepatectomy between 1995 and 2009. Patients undergoing associated digestive resection (group I, n = 32) were compared with patients without associated digestive surgery (group II, n = 17).
RESULTS: The feasibility rate was 87.5% (49 patients). Neither the type and extent of hepatectomy nor the type of chemotherapy administered differed between the two groups. The median interval between hepatectomies was 1.79 and 2.07 months for groups I and II, respectively (not significant). One patient (group I) died of liver failure after the second hepatectomy. Postoperative morbidity rates were comparable: 37.5% (group I) vs. 35.5% (group II) after the first hepatectomy and 46.9% (group I) vs. 52.9% (group II) after the second hepatectomy. The median hospital stay after the first hepatectomy was longer in group I (13.5 days) than in group II (10 days) (P < 0.01). Median follow-up was 54 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 45.8 months, and 3- and 5-year OS were 58 and 31%, respectively. Median OS was longer for group II (58 months) than for group I (34 months) (P = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: Digestive tract resection associated with two-stage hepatectomy does not increase postoperative mortality or morbidity nor does it lead to delay in chemotherapy or a reduction in cycles administered. The need for digestive tract surgery should not affect the surgical management of two-stage hepatectomy patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053455     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-012-1002-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  19 in total

1.  The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000; 2:333-39.

Authors:  Yeung Yuk Pang
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

3.  Combined first-stage hepatectomy and colorectal resection in a two-stage hepatectomy strategy for bilobar synchronous liver metastases.

Authors:  M Karoui; L Vigano; P Goyer; A Ferrero; A Luciani; M Aglietta; C Delbaldo; S Cirillo; L Capussotti; D Cherqui
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Two-stage hepatectomy: A planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors.

Authors:  R Adam; A Laurent; D Azoulay; D Castaing; H Bismuth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Major liver resections synchronous with colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Lorenzo Capussotti; Alessandro Ferrero; Luca Viganò; Dario Ribero; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Roberto Polastri
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Long-term results of two-stage hepatectomy for irresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Dennis A Wicherts; Rafael Miller; Robbert J de Haas; Georgia Bitsakou; Eric Vibert; Luc-Antoine Veilhan; Daniel Azoulay; Henri Bismuth; Denis Castaing; René Adam
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  Robert Martin; Philip Paty; Yuman Fong; Andrew Grace; Alfred Cohen; Ronald DeMatteo; William Jarnagin; Leslie Blumgart
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Morbidity of ostomy takedown.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Shlomo Israelit; Daniel Klaristenfeld; Paul Selvindoss; Petar Vukasin; Glenn Ault; Robert W Beart
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Vedra Augenstein; Nathan P Reuter; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Systemic chemotherapy and two-stage hepatectomy for extensive bilateral colorectal liver metastases: perioperative safety and survival.

Authors:  Yun Shin Chun; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Dario Ribero; Matteo Donadon; John T Mullen; Cathy Eng; David C Madoff; David Z Chang; Linus Ho; Scott Kopetz; Steven H Wei; Steven A Curley; Eddie K Abdalla
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cytoreduction for colorectal metastases: liver, lung, peritoneum, lymph nodes, bone, brain. When does it palliate, prolong survival, and potentially cure?

Authors:  Camille L Stewart; Susanne Warner; Kaori Ito; Mustafa Raoof; Geena X Wu; Jonathan Kessler; Jae Y Kim; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 2.  A literature review of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): so far, so good.

Authors:  Martin de Santibañes; Luis Boccalatte; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-10-20

Review 3.  Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Pushing the Limits.

Authors:  Guido Torzilli; René Adam; Luca Viganò; Katsunori Imai; Jeremias Goransky; Andrea Fontana; Christian Toso; Pietro Majno; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 11.740

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.