Literature DB >> 10196487

Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

A J Mangram1, T C Horan, M L Pearson, L C Silver, W R Jarvis.   

Abstract

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The "Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999" presents the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s recommendations for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs), formerly called surgical wound infections. This two-part guideline updates and replaces previous guidelines.1,2 Part I, "Surgical Site Infection: An Overview," describes the epidemiology, definitions, microbiology, pathogenesis, and surveillance of SSIs. Included is a detailed discussion of the pre-, intra-, and postoperative issues relevant to SSI genesis. Part II, "Recommendations for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection," represents the consensus of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) regarding strategies for the prevention of SSIs.3 Whenever possible, the recommendations in Part II are based on data from well-designed scientific studies. However, there are a limited number of studies that clearly validate risk factors and prevention measures for SSI. By necessity, available studies have often been conducted in narrowly defined patient populations or for specific kinds of operations, making generalization of their findings to all specialties and types of operations potentially problematic. This is especially true regarding the implementation of SSI prevention measures. Finally, some of the infection control practices routinely used by surgical teams cannot be rigorously studied for ethical or logistical reasons (e.g., wearing vs not wearing gloves). Thus, some of the recommendations in Part II are based on a strong theoretical rationale and suggestive evidence in the absence of confirmatory scientific knowledge.It has been estimated that approximately 75% of all operations in the United States will be performed in "ambulatory," "same-day," or "outpatient" operating rooms by the turn of the century.4 In recommending various SSI prevention methods, this document makes no distinction between surgical care delivered in such settings and that provided in conventional inpatient operating rooms. This document is primarily intended for use by surgeons, operating room nurses, postoperative inpatient and clinic nurses, infection control professionals, anesthesiologists, healthcare epidemiologists, and other personnel directly responsible for the prevention of nosocomial infections. This document does not: Specifically address issues unique to burns, trauma, transplant procedures, or transmission of bloodborne pathogens from healthcare worker to patient, nor does it specifically address details of SSI prevention in pediatric surgical practice. It has been recently shown in a multicenter study of pediatric surgical patients that characteristics related to the operations are more important than those related to the physiologic status of the patients.5 In general, all SSI prevention measures effective in adult surgical care are indicated in pediatric surgical care. Specifically address procedures performed outside of the operating room (e.g., endoscopic procedures), nor does it provide guidance for infection prevention for invasive procedures such as cardiac catheterization or interventional radiology. Nonetheless, it is likely that many SSI prevention strategies also could be applied or adapted to reduce infectious complications associated with these procedures. Specifically recommend SSI prevention methods unique to minimally invasive operations (i.e., laparoscopic surgery). Available SSI surveillance data indicate that laparoscopic operations generally have a lower or comparable SSI risk when contrasted to open operations.6-11 SSI prevention measures applicable in open operations (e.g., open cholecystectomy) are indicated for their laparoscopic counterparts (e.g., laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Recommend specific antiseptic agents for patient preoperative skin preparations or for healthcare worker hand/forearm antisepsis. Hospitals should choose from products recommended for these activitie

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10196487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  652 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Asymptomatic omental granuloma following spillage of gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy protects patients and influences surgeons' decisions: a review.

Authors:  Iordanis N Papadopoulos; Spyridon Christodoulou; Nikolaos Economopoulos
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-23

3.  Intraperitoneal mesh implantation for fascial dehiscence and open abdomen.

Authors:  Moritz Scholtes; Anita Kurmann; Christian A Seiler; Daniel Candinas; Guido Beldi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prevention and Treatment of Postsurgical Head and Neck Infections.

Authors:  Rebecca Fraioli; Jonas T. Johnson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 5.  The Effect of patient warming during Caesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Sultan; A S Habib; Y Cho; B Carvalho
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Gentamicin/collagen sponge use may reduce the risk of surgical site infections for patients undergoing cardiac operations: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle B Formanek; Loreen A Herwaldt; Eli N Perencevich; Marin L Schweizer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  The impact of deep surgical site infection on surgical outcomes after posterior adult spinal deformity surgery: a matched control study.

Authors:  Sleiman Haddad; Susana Núñez-Pereira; Carlos Pigrau; Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Ahmet Alanay; Emre R Acaroglu; Frank S Kleinstueck; Ibrahim Obeid; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Etiology and classification of septic coxitis].

Authors:  M Ettinger; M Petri
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Juan Camilo Gomez-Ospina; James A Zapata-Copete; Monica Bejarano; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Practice variation in treatment of suspected asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to cardiac surgery: are there differences in postoperative outcome? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marije P de Lange; Uday Sonker; Johannes C Kelder; Rien de Vos
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.