Literature DB >> 20354283

A hybrid strategy of offline adaptive planning and online image guidance for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Yu Lei1, Qiuwen Wu.   

Abstract

Offline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has been used to effectively correct and compensate for prostate motion and reduce the required margin. The efficacy depends on the characteristics of the patient setup error and interfraction motion through the whole treatment; specifically, systematic errors are corrected and random errors are compensated for through the margins. In online image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate cancer, the translational setup error and inter-fractional prostate motion are corrected through pre-treatment imaging and couch correction at each fraction. However, the rotation and deformation of the target are not corrected and only accounted for with margins in treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the offline ART strategy is necessary for an online IGRT protocol and to evaluate the benefit of the hybrid strategy. First, to investigate the rationale of the hybrid strategy, 592 cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT) images taken before and after each fraction for an online IGRT protocol from 16 patients were analyzed. Specifically, the characteristics of prostate rotation were analyzed. It was found that there exist systematic inter-fractional prostate rotations, and they are patient specific. These rotations, if not corrected, are persistent through the treatment fraction, and rotations detected in early fractions are representative of those in later fractions. These findings suggest that the offline adaptive replanning strategy is beneficial to the online IGRT protocol with further margin reductions. Second, to quantitatively evaluate the benefit of the hybrid strategy, 412 repeated helical CT scans from 25 patients during the course of treatment were included in the replanning study. Both low-risk patients (LRP, clinical target volume, CTV = prostate) and intermediate-risk patients (IRP, CTV = prostate + seminal vesicles) were included in the simulation. The contours of prostate and seminal vesicles were delineated on each CT. The benefit of margin reduction to compensate for both rotation and deformation in the hybrid strategy was evaluated geometrically. With the hybrid strategy, the planning margins can be reduced by 1.4 mm for LRP, and 2.0 mm for IRP, compared with the standard online IGRT only, to maintain the same 99% target volume coverage. The average relative reduction in planning target volume (PTV) based on the internal target volume (ITV) from PTV based on CTV is 19% for LRP, and 27% for IRP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354283      PMCID: PMC3042853          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/8/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  25 in total

1.  The required number of treatment imaging days for an effective off-line correction of systematic errors in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer--a radiobiological analysis.

Authors:  A M Amer; R I Mackay; S A Roberts; J H Hendry; P C Williams
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Treatment planning issues related to prostate movement in response to differential filling of the rectum and bladder.

Authors:  R K Ten Haken; J D Forman; D K Heimburger; A Gerhardsson; D L McShan; C Perez-Tamayo; S L Schoeppel; A S Lichter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  The cumulative verification image analysis tool for offline evaluation of portal images.

Authors:  J Wong; D Yan; J Michalski; M Graham; K Halverson; W Harms; J Purdy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Electronic portal imaging with on-line correction of setup error in thoracic irradiation: clinical evaluation.

Authors:  J Van de Steene; F Van den Heuvel; A Bel; D Verellen; J De Mey; M Noppen; M De Beukeleer; G Storme
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Zvi Fuks; Margie Hunt; Yoshiya Yamada; Christine Marion; C Clifton Ling; Howard Amols; E S Venkatraman; Steven A Leibel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers.

Authors:  J M Balter; H M Sandler; K Lam; R L Bree; A S Lichter; R K ten Haken
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Daily electronic portal imaging for morbidly obese men undergoing radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura Ellen Millender; Michele Aubin; Jean Pouliot; Katsuto Shinohara; Mack Roach
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging.

Authors:  A Bel; P H Vos; P T Rodrigus; C L Creutzberg; A G Visser; J C Stroom; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  J C Roeske; J D Forman; C F Mesina; T He; C A Pelizzari; E Fontenla; S Vijayakumar; G T Chen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility.

Authors:  J M Balter; K L Lam; H M Sandler; J F Littles; R L Bree; R K Ten Haken
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evaluations of an adaptive planning technique incorporating dose feedback in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Han Liu; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance image guidance in external beam radiation therapy planning and delivery.

Authors:  Ilamurugu Arivarasan; Chandrasekaran Anuradha; Shanmuga Subramanian; Ayyalusamy Anantharaman; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Dosimetric and volumetric effects in clinical target volume and organs at risk during postprostatectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ahmed Gawish; Ahmed Ali Chughtai; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Dosimetric and geometric evaluation of a hybrid strategy of offline adaptive planning and online image guidance for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Han Liu; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  On-line adaptive radiation therapy: feasibility and clinical study.

Authors:  Taoran Li; Xiaofeng Zhu; Danthai Thongphiew; W Robert Lee; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Qiuwen Wu; Fang-Fang Yin; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Predictive dose accumulation for HN adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Donghoon Lee; Pengpeng Zhang; Saad Nadeem; Sadegh Alam; Jue Jiang; Amanda Caringi; Natasha Allgood; Michalis Aristophanous; James Mechalakos; Yu-Chi Hu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A "rolling average" multiple adaptive planning method to compensate for target volume changes in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Han Liu; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Towards automated on-line adaptation of 2-Step IMRT plans: QUASIMODO phantom and prostate cancer cases.

Authors:  Kostyantyn Holubyev; Klaus Bratengeier; Mark Gainey; Bülent Polat; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Prostate rotation detected from implanted markers can affect dose coverage and cannot be simply dismissed.

Authors:  Qingyang Shang; Lawrence J Sheplan Olsen; Kevin Stephans; Rahul Tendulkar; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.