Literature DB >> 21772083

Dosimetric and geometric evaluation of a hybrid strategy of offline adaptive planning and online image guidance for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Han Liu1, Qiuwen Wu.   

Abstract

For prostate cancer patients, online image-guided (IG) radiotherapy has been widely used in clinic to correct the translational inter-fractional motion at each treatment fraction. For uncertainties that cannot be corrected online, such as rotation and deformation of the target volume, margins are still required to be added to the clinical target volume (CTV) for the treatment planning. Offline adaptive radiotherapy has been implemented to optimize the treatment for each individual patient based on the measurements at early stages of treatment process. It has been shown that offline adaptive radiotherapy can effectively reduce the required margin. Recently a hybrid strategy of offline adaptive replanning and online IG was proposed and the geometric evaluation was performed. It was found that the planning margins can further be reduced by 1-2 mm compared to online IG only strategy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric benefits of such a hybrid strategy on the target and organs at risk. A total of 420 repeated helical computed tomography scans from 28 patients were included in the study. Both low-risk patients (LRP, CTV = prostate) and intermediate-risk patients (IRP, CTV = prostate + seminal vesicles, SV) were included in the simulation. Two registration methods, based on center-of-mass shift of prostate only and prostate plus SV, were performed for IRP. The intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used in the simulation. Criteria on both cumulative and fractional doses were evaluated. Furthermore, the geometric evaluation was extended to investigate the optimal number of fractions necessary to construct the internal target volume (ITV) for the hybrid strategy. The dosimetric margin improvement was smaller than its geometric counterpart and was in the range of 0-1 mm. The optimal number of fractions necessary for the ITV construction is 2 for LRPs and 3-4 for IRPs in a hypofractionation protocol. A new cumulative index of target volume was proposed for the evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy strategies, and it was found that it had the advantages over other indices in evaluating different adaptive radiotherapy strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21772083      PMCID: PMC3145215          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

1.  Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation.

Authors:  Marcel van Herk; Peter Remeijer; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  The required number of treatment imaging days for an effective off-line correction of systematic errors in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer--a radiobiological analysis.

Authors:  A M Amer; R I Mackay; S A Roberts; J H Hendry; P C Williams
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  When should systematic patient positioning errors in radiotherapy be corrected?

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld; Marcel van Herk; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Prostate intrafraction motion assessed by simultaneous kV fluoroscopy at MV delivery II: adaptive strategies.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload.

Authors:  H C de Boer; B J Heijmen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Yan; D Lockman; D Brabbins; L Tyburski; A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans based on the equivalent uniform dose.

Authors:  Qiuwen Wu; Radhe Mohan; Andrzej Niemierko; Rupert Schmidt-Ullrich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions.

Authors:  Kei Kitamura; Hiroki Shirato; Yvette Seppenwoolde; Rikiya Onimaru; Makoto Oda; Katsuhisa Fujita; Shinichi Shimizu; Nobuo Shinohara; Toru Harabayashi; Kazuo Miyasaka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging.

Authors:  A Bel; P H Vos; P T Rodrigus; C L Creutzberg; A G Visser; J C Stroom; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility.

Authors:  J M Balter; K L Lam; H M Sandler; J F Littles; R L Bree; R K Ten Haken
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluations of an adaptive planning technique incorporating dose feedback in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Han Liu; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Slav Yartsev; Glenn Bauman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A "rolling average" multiple adaptive planning method to compensate for target volume changes in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Han Liu; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios.

Authors:  Y G Roussakis; H Dehghani; S Green; G J Webster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Prostate rotation detected from implanted markers can affect dose coverage and cannot be simply dismissed.

Authors:  Qingyang Shang; Lawrence J Sheplan Olsen; Kevin Stephans; Rahul Tendulkar; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications.

Authors:  Raj Varadhan; Grigorios Karangelis; Karthik Krishnan; Susanta Hui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?

Authors:  Richard Oates; Suki Gill; Farshad Foroudi; Michael Lim Joon; Michal Schneider; Mathias Bressel; Tomas Kron
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Dosimetric benefits of daily treatment plan adaptation for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Miriam Eckl; Gustavo R Sarria; Sandra Springer; Marvin Willam; Arne M Ruder; Volker Steil; Michael Ehmann; Frederik Wenz; Jens Fleckenstein
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.